Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Assuming you're right in that estimate, the hard work is getting more 9s. As a total kind of spitball number, you want 4 more of them.


sort by: page size:

Correct me if I'm wrong, but that still seems like a lot of nines.

I'd add more 9's to that number.

How many nines is that?

It's the ever-present question. How many 9s would you like on your service?

I agree, except you need more 9s.

Let’s add a few more 9s to that, just to make it even more realistic.

I think that is likely too many nines (depending on how you are counting and weighting “use cases”).

One 9 could also be 9%. I think we should be thankful for two 9s when we get them.

Only four nines? Ridiculous.

(/s)


Or 9, 9, 9, 9, 9, and 9.

9 seems to high for 'several'...

Maybe 'quite a few'?


Reading this right now and I think it's 6, not 9. But yes.

I've always heard that adding another 9 adds another 3 zeros to the cost.

There are six 9s in there. Pretty solid!

That's still a lot more than nine.

All those nines cost extra.

Depends on how many 9s you want in your reliability. The first couple aren't too bad, gets harder after that.

I was going to say that, then I noticed people are arguing about the "number of 9s of availability". You guys have WHAT?

11 9's. Impressive.
next

Legal | privacy