Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Makes sense assuming that authority doesn't leak their private keys like a sieve.


sort by: page size:

Hopefully they have good security around the private key.

Either that or they've got the cooperation of someone who has access to that private key, potentially the CA itself. But a compromise seems more likely in this case.

Okay, then they leak their private key.

ah, right. i didn't consider that their private key could have been leaked if they were once vulnerable (i was only considering passwords and the like). good point, thanks!

They have numerous private keys precisely because of leakage risk. In that case only one (or two) of them will get leaked (and then hopefully revoked), leaving the others intact.

Actually... that'd be a private key.

I am surprised private keys have never leaked.

FWIW they claim the private key was encrypted. Granted, having it air-gapped as much as possible is even better.

Better yet, they can just publish something encrypted with every compromised public key. Only people with the corresponding private keys can ascertain if they're compromised.

Except where they have a warrant and reach their dirty little fingers into certificate authorities. Unless you're doing key exchange yourself I would assume nothing is truly private.

I wonder why they do that instead of asking for access to the private keys.

Either that, or they will simply intimidate and even torture people for their private keys.

May sound far-fetched, but it isn't.


If it did leak, why wouldn’t they just revoke and then reissue the valid passports with a new private key?

The same argument could be made about the possibility of a CA’s key being leaked.


Just give the government a copy of the private key. What could go wrong? It’s not like anyone is hacking into the government these days.

Sure, ok, so they have an encrypted version of the private key!?

this shouldn't be an issue when the clients share the private key.

The government? Or the creator? If it were the creator I'm sure that the creator would have the common sense to pregenerate and store the private keys somewhere safe.

Exactly. And think about private keys for SSL certificates. I'm not even sure if those are covered by the legal wording, but I wouldn't be surprised if they were.

If it's true I'm really curious how they did this. Probably they got the private key somehow?
next

Legal | privacy