Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

It's at best extremely risky and no guarantee of your childrens' success, with poor failure modes.


sort by: page size:

The technology is risky enough I am sure normal parents won't attempt to put their kids for experiments.

And I am sure nations won't be interested in this as well, because the risk is high, the failures are unknown, and for the most part, the reward gets too long to reap.


This technology is ineffective at saving children and highly effective at ruining more lives than it could theoretically save even with perfect conditions.

But it is toxic and dangerous and exploits you. It's also a very valuable tool. As with all things, there's a cost/benefit calculation to be done here.

I think that the cost/benefit ratio is hugely unfavorable when we're talking about very young children.


I'm wondering if you read the article. The risks and rewards for kids basically net to zero.

This sounds noble and good and all, but us parents can't justify the risk. We need to be here for our children.

It sure does seem risky to give children something for which the long-term risks are unknown. I’d hate to think people have been doing that in recent years.

The children could not consent, and there is a real danger for various side effects while the benefit was very dubious. The method was also sloppy and didn't produce exactly the intended result but slightly different edits, which again is a recipe for more unintended effects.

As a parent-to-be, this is the one thing that scares me most. You can't learn risk assessment while living in a bubble. Which means I'm going to have to watch my kids run into problems I know I could prevent because what they learn from the experience is more valuable than preventing the situation.

That is a terrifyingly difficult decision, given the potential consequences.


What if it will kill your children?

I think you're really overselling the risk here. At most any given kid is going to do this once, and the vast majority not at all.

I saw the keyword, and as I qualified in the full comment, it’s a risk and one that shouldn’t be borne by the children

What do you mean, these pills that make my kids suddenly have A grades and fun to hang out with are not risk free??

With children, that's a risky belief.

The product doesn't lead to children dying. It increases the risk of a certain type of fatality when used improperly, with the overall odds still being miniscule.

And yes, parents have to take some responsibility. Nothing will ever be 100% safe.


I do not think this is that risky, it sounds quite clear from the parent's description of their life.

We risk your children’s health for all sorts of things and it would be absurd if we didn’t.

No it's not. There's still no evidence that there is any real risk to children. Please prove otherwise. Anecdotes and one in a million cases don't count.

The risk is turning away young minds.

You can't protect your child and there's no guarantee that he will be safe. Think about cancer and random events like school shooters. All of this happens daily and you can't prevent it
next

Legal | privacy