Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

GP's expecting them to come up short in the long run.


sort by: page size:

GP is implying that companies that don't are by definition performing poorly by missing out on the margin.

Correct, it's potential that they are paying for GP's discomfort at times

That's the fallacy GP is anticipating and parodying.

I think that's kind of the whole problem GP is alluding to

What's the excuse GP is making exactly?

That ... doesn't solve the problem GP is noting.

What makes you think that's the problem the GP was referring to? They haven't posted at all again in this thread to confirm exactly what was meant.

I don't know the answer. But I think it's fair for me to point out that the GP hasn't thought it through either.

If GP had the answer to that, they wouldn't likely be held back.

And? What does that have to do with the GP?

It's a big assumption that the reason the GP isn't in trouble is that they make wise financial decisions.

I don't know what the GP was thinking. Hopefully exactly that.

I think the point GP was making is that it's to be expected, so don't be surprised when it happens.

Yeah if that's the case, the GP seems dumb.

That’s precisely the point the GP is making

It's a cliché. That is one reason the GP comment was unsubstantive.

I think their point was to a more general audience not the gp in particular.

I am sure that's exactly the point the GP is making.

It's in the last sentence of the GP
next

Legal | privacy