Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

>To be able to even consider to move there I would need a salary bump of 3x-5x. No way this will ever happen.

You'd be surprised. Granted it was over a period of 4 years, but I did hit that 5x.



sort by: page size:

> Also I will relocate anywhere who can pay me at least 60-70k.

If you are OK with less than that, but a crazy lower cost of living. I highly encourage you to look at the Midwest.

http://www.hudl.com/jobs/

https://up.jobs/

Actually, pretty much http://www.siliconprairienews.com/opportunities


> I mean, as far as I know, people get like a 2x-4x raise moving to silicon valley from europe.

One factor to keep in mind here, though, is that the cost of living there is so insane that even a multiplier on pay could go with a total quality of life decrease.


> Nor will I ever move to SF, no matter how lucrative the offer.

You have never lived there, if I understand correctly. Why wouldn't you move there? Is there some experience you have with it? Housing prices? Internet rumors?


> I will have to relocate (which I wanted to do anyway), but I can't fathom why anyone _wouldn't_ be looking right now given the state of the job market.

Could it be that most of your compensation bump is due to the relocation rather than the current market? To take extremes, moving to SV from almost anywhere in the world would result in such bumps, but that was already the case a few years ago.


> I was once asked to move to SF for a job and given a 20% bump compared to Toronto salaries so I could afford it

Just to dwell on this point for a bit, I think your offer was not equitable. When I was offered to leave the GTA for SF I received a 50% pay bump with the knowledge that it would be closer to 200% in a few years.

Fast forward 1.5 years and that's exactly what happened. A few years later and the pay bump was closer to 300% and I'm happy it worked out the way I imagined, otherwise like you said, it would not have been worth it.


> The salaries here are higher, but the housing prices are much, much higher.

I'm Australian so YMMV, but six months ago I took a 25% pay cut to move out of Sydney to somewhere with lower housing costs and a shorter commute. I'm never going back.


> I'd never work for Tesla locally as I'd probably have to make over $1M/year to just have my current (very spartan) standard of living.

There is no big city in the USA where anyone needs $1m/year to live a “very spartan” standard of living.


> it will just be a very expensive lesson learned.

Moving doesn't have to be a financial hit. If you move to an area with higher wages it may earn you money.


> Your expectations and apparent level of entitlement are a bit surprising.

Why do you say that?

It sounds like he doesn't want to be out of pocket for a relocation.

He has an upper middle class job and lifestyle and is moving for an upper middle class role. So he wants an upper middle class relocation package.


> I understand larger cities offer a higher salary

Nah. Salaries in the Bay Area are a third of what they should be to compensate for the cost of living.

You can live in lots of big cities in the US and still have discretionary income leftover. The Bay Area is just bananas.


> Nobody moves for $30k a year.

I personally know people who have moved for half that amount.


> Your career better be going to a really, really good place if it requires living in an area with $4500/month rent.

There's no requirement that you stay in the same place which made your career.

My personal plan is to work in NYC for the next ten years and then take the accumulated savings to buy a house outright in a nice town.


> I was willing to relocate to anywhere in the western US

The western US is a lot more expensive than the rest of the US.

https://cdn.nar.realtor//sites/default/files/documents/ehs-0...


> But to make that you have to live in an area with a much higher cost of living

No, you don't. Many choose to, but there are plenty of $100K developer jobs in cities with reasonable cost of living.


> Everything is outrageously expensive > Middle class gets crushed

I moved out of New York City in 2020. The overriding reason was not this, it was just a fluke that I got a very compelling out of state job offer in 2019, and they requested I move in 2020.

However, I am making about about $150-$160k as an SWE, and it goes a lot further here (although having to spend $700-$800 a month for a car, which I did not have to do in NYC, bites into that a little). I have a new, big, apartment with a front door to a tree-lined street in a nice walkable neighborhood near my workplace for less than $2000 a month. In New York I would have an older, smaller apartment on a higher floor in not as nice of a neighborhood for more a month.

I know people say to move to the Bay area because that's where the action is for tech jobs and where you make connections etc., but I don't see why not take a step on a way for a decent paying job in a cheap city where you can accumulate savings while your skillset is increasing.

The juniors/associates I work with making <$100k a year say they can barely afford their expenses now here. I don't know what they'd be doing in the Bay Area or New York. They have roommates too.

I saved up a ton of money down here, and gained experience as well. If I move back to New York (or to the Bay Area), I do so on surer footing - I have a lot of money saved up for a rainy day now.

It also makes for a situation where those with lower income - even associate/junior SWEs at Fortune 100 companies - can't afford to live in cities like NYC, San Francisco etc.


> If they're not offering a pretty major cost of living adjustment to salaries (probably in the realm of doubling salaries), this is going to really suck for those who were previously remote.

Literally no salary adjustment will make it better for many people. Your spouse has a geo-tied job? Your kids love their school (or, hell you just don't want to raise kids there full stop)? Oh, and what salary adjustment will make up for it if you live in the kind of place you can afford a half-acre back yard?


> I have tried to hire in low COL places and people want to move to SF instead.

In another comment you suggest that you'd pay $350k, but at $700k you would suspect their loyalty. I'm in Portland and not interested in moving to SF, and if you're offering $350 - $700k comp I'd be happy to talk with you. :-)


> someone making 140k in SF might make 110k-120k in places like Boise or Denver

As someone who moved from Pittsburgh to San Francisco and had my compensation quadruple, I call bullshit.


> But if they had offered me a full-time position, they would have had to offer to pay me at least $250k-$350k per year, for me to be able to afford to keep that same apartment.

Huh? Rent is expensive in Cupertino, but not THAT expensive. You can live quite comfortably with half that.

next

Legal | privacy