Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Not only that but someone can sue you even if something isn’t libelous. They just have to believe it is


sort by: page size:

It's not libel if you can prove it's true.

Why wouldn't it be libel?

If it's _actually_ false, they can be sued for libel.

It's only libel if it isn't true.

This, and the fact that the truth can not be libelous. As long as you're not misrepresenting a claim, you're fine.

It's not libel if it's true, and they'd only need to prove that to civil standard.

Unless they are in the UK. The libel laws in the UK are pretty crazy where you need to prove that the statements are true.

Can you sue them for libel then?

Libel is a civil matter. The government can't charge you with libel.

not in the UK. Over here it can still be libel even if true(!)

You can if its defamation.

IANAL but if it is not true, you open yourself up to libel.

People can bring libel cases in the case that it's actually libel. Apart from that, America doesn't protect the ability to give out poison in the Constitution, it protects free speech.

because then it's libel.

Doesn't that just fall under libel?

I believe the point OP is making is that you can be accused of libel for speaking the truth.

How do you avoid libel?

What about libel?

You can sue for anything, so yes, but in this thought experiment they would lose the lawsuit. In order for a defamation/libel lawsuit to be successful, the statement must be untrue.
next

Legal | privacy