Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Hm. FCC getting a ruling overturned that strengthens the law doesn't change the existing law, however.


sort by: page size:

The FCC gains it's authority to create regulation from federal law though.

It doesn't change your point, but that was the FTC, not the FCC.

I don't follow. The FCC making up rules as it sees fit is somehow better than a body of legal precedent and perhaps some fixed legislation?

Huh? Which part of the telecommunications act gives the FCC that power, that has not been struck down by the courts?

Is this ruling not the FCC regaining "teeth"?

I couldn't agree more. There's absolutely no way this ruling can benefit the customers. The article mentionned that the FCC could rewrite its rule so to fit under the law, so it may very well be far from over.

The FCC passed a regulation to stop the practice and Congress voted to overturn that regulation.

The FCC did have the backing of legislation, which is why it took an act of Congress to overturn it.

I’m not particularly familiar with FCC law, but don’t they tend to... not approve things like this? Not being sarcastic, honest question.

No, wrong again. The resolution prohibits the FCC from making rules like this in the future, so the legal climate itself is different. The threat of regulation doesn't hang over this shady-ass business anymore, and things like this don't happen in a vacuum. Your "fake news" claims are the greatest "misrepresentation" in this thread

It's not a law. It's an "administrative regulation" and there's nothing anybody other than the FCC commissioners can do to stop it.

FCC rulings can be overruled via congress or by the FCC itself in the future.

It takes an act of God to overturn a treaty.


Looks like it might take an act of Congress to bestow the authority? Can't find the full text of the decision yet, but first reports seem to suggest the court finds the FCC's authority doesn't extend to enforcing net neutrality rather than net neutrality is itself unenforceable.

Alternative headline: FCC declines to violate the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

No, Congress is removing the FCC's authority to make rules on this topic. It would take an act of congress to give it back.

They did. And it resulted in the FCC regulations that just got rolled back.

FTC can still regulate ISP's after this bill passes, if I understand it correctly.

Edit: Nope, apparently this just nullifies the FCC rule, it's not an actual bill to change authority away from FCC. D'oh.


So FCC rulings against this type of service is not applied to mobile providers?

next

Legal | privacy