Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Naturally argumentum ad hominem is always the best strategy.


sort by: page size:

You are in essence saying that ad hominem is a valid debating technique.

Ad hominem makes for a damn good argument, especially if the person in case doesn’t try to appease everyone.

Ad hominem attacks are always a great approach to discussions. /s

Ah yes, ad hominem, the tool of choice for reasonable people.

Is Ad hominem really the best you can do?

Ad hominem is the best way to get the point across. Don't ever change, sir/madam.

Ad hominem attacks are famously the first resort of people who are correct about everything.

Ad hominem is a fair counter-argument to appeal to authority.

This is what's known as an ad hominem argument

If an ad hominem is the best criticism you can come up with, it seems correct to me.

Ad hominem doesn't invalidate an argument, it speaks to credibility.

Ad hominem != arguments

Which is precisely why argumentum ad hominem is something to be wary of.

this sort of thing is known as argument ad hominem.

Argumentum ad hominem usually implies an irrational opinion or manipulative rhetoric.

Ad hominem argument, yes.

“Ad hominem is a notoriously weak logical argument. And is usually used to distract the focus of a discussion - to move it from an indefensible point and to attack the opponent."

~ Lord Aquitainus Attis


Ad hominems seldomly make for a constructive argument.

Argument ad hominem.
next

Legal | privacy