I really don't think I should be having to make this comment, but it's not the flu. You know it's not the flu, we all know it's not the flu. Please stop trolling.
Statistically it is still far more likely that they had the flu. I think it is dangerous to overstate the problem because then when it really does become an issue it will be dismissed because of all the previous folks "crying wolf."
> I think a serious person should be equally reluctant to join the "it's just a flu" camp either.
The long-term effects of flu are not studied that well, by the way. On the basis we're used to it from before such studies were possible.
None of those symptoms we hear about, getting our breath, unable to smell, brain fog etc., none of them are new. And they imply internal damage that lasts.
> In reality, most people have never even had the flu. They often mistake a severe common cold for the flu.
Really? My understanding is that high fever and body aches are the distinguishing factors between flu and other illnesses, and I distinctly remember having the flu a few times (including when I had it a few years ago and was given a test to confirm). I'd be very surprised if fewer than 50% of the population had ever had the flu.
I would agree that people sometimes use the word "flu" to refer to things that are not actually the flu, but I doubt that there are that many people out there who have been around for ~4 decades but never got the flu.
"See, told you, just a bad flu." would be the expected response.
reply