Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

They're the same company but not (yet?) the same drives.


sort by: page size:

That's a completely different market, to which are marketed different drives.

In reality, it is probably exactly that. These are the drives that didn't make the cut to be sold independently.

I dont think that is the case, as in they are not mixed up in production and sold with different Brand.

They try to get rid of the HGST brand but failed. And had to go back to HGST branding specifically for HDD coming from the acquired HGST Factory.

i.e AFAIK HGST is still HGST.


Western Digital bought HGST and those drives have some different branding now, I forget exact which.

They may have different branding or model numbers, but in terms of technical specifications they are no different to internal drives.

I'd be shocked if they were not the same drives you buy from a supplier.

Could be a completely different company and model of storage.

It's now called "HGST (a Western Digital company)" and the two product lines (WD and HGST HDDs) are totally separate in both parts and manufacturing.

/HGST employee


It's still a separate factory making separate drives. This line even uses a different storage controller. But this is also true for luxury ranges, in general, so you may be asking for too fine of a distinction. (Their usual luxury range is the WD Red, however.)

The hardware isn't identical. Hetzner is known for having more drive failures than is typical as a result of replacing failing drives with "refurbished" ones.

My read was they they aren't switching over everything - they are testing new drives, to figure out what reliability looks like.

Once the cost curve costs over, they will then know which vendors drives to go all in on.


Most enterprise drives come off the exact same production line too.. Some have a different external interface but the important parts are all nearly the same, they might test them differently

This comes across as a pet peeve. If the drives are branded, marketed, and sold as HGST, then they are HGST drives. Even if Yev is wrong, it's possible that WD or Toshiba are maintaining HGST drives to different specifications or QA standards.

And I don't think Yev's wrong, I'm pretty sure I remember reading/hearing the same, and http://www.zdnet.com/article/western-digitals-hgst-cuts-500-... also suggests that WD is maintaining HGST as a separate entity.

Calling HGST drives Western Digital or Toshiba would be more confusing, not less.


You should read the rest of the thread. It's likely a completely different drive.

If there's one thing I've learned from seeing these reports over the years, it's that the specific drive model matters more than the brand.

This is a completely different category of product than their low end consumer Evo drives, though.

They got two new ones.

But it would be very weird if different drives in the same batch had different capacities. That's a lot of wasted effort.


Not extremely unlikely if they were identical drives from the same manufacturing batch. It's good practise to use diverse manufacturers or at least batches when adding disks to a raid array for just this reason.

The article actually states that the drives are not new.
next

Legal | privacy