Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

This was banned by india in december. It got a lot of press about ‘uncertainty’ when that happened.

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/02/05/amazon-how-india-ecommerce-l...



sort by: page size:

From your [2],

> Last month, India tightened rules that will disallow foreign-owned online retailers from selling products via companies in which they own equity, and forbid them from pushing merchants to sell exclusively through their platforms

Amazon and other companies are running into this problem even in the US - https://www.cnbc.com/2020/04/23/wsj-amazon-uses-data-from-th.... So the speculation that action of Indian government is just that - speculation.


I'm afraid I don't know all the details. This article has some info: https://thenextweb.com/in/2019/02/01/heres-why-amazon-cant-s...

But isn't Amazon risking that Souq itself might get banned in these countries if they allow this to happen? Or am I understanding it wrong?

Amazon can't directly sell products in India due to FDI (foreign direct investment) laws. These are laws that restrict foreign companies on multi-brand retail in the country.

That's what India basically regulated with Amazon. i.e. a company can't sell proudts on their open-market platform from companies you have a stake in (or your own generics presumably?).

https://www.digitalcommerce360.com/2019/02/01/new-ecommerce-...


Also the ban is for one year. Amazon’s plan is to suspend selling while the public opinion is against it. Once this issue is forgotten, they will begin selling Rekognition again to the government .

Amazon has actually been requiring vendors to supply this info for a few years now. They have it in their database, but refuse to expose it. The Indian government forced them to, mostly because they are in a cold war with China and want to wean themselves off from Chinese goods.

Is it similarly forbidden in the US? i.e. Is it legal for Amazon to practice similarly?

Isn't this a big issue with Amazon right now? What does the law say about it in that case?

I'm surprised it's legal. Didn't Amazon have to backtrack on something like this?

Is Amazon breaking a law?

I would have called this conspiracy territory, but then it broke that Amazon was doing exactly that in India.

https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/amazon-i...


Curious, how does this impact Amazon?

The reporting on this has been a bit strange.

Amazon was not a party to the legal action, but is presumably affected by its ruling.


Yeah they were violating the regulations with Cloudtail & Appario and with growing pressure they've no choice now.

But still there are loads of sellers claiming to be an 'Amazon Brand'[1] on their listing. If Amazon does have something to do with them, Then again it's a violation of the regulations.

Then, What about 'Amazon Basics' products[2]? I'm sure Amazon manufactures them.

The whole thing is messy and keeps changing according to the 'Mega Billionaires' fight to hold their position, But if this results in temporary consumer choice until one of them wins and we have to pledge our souls then it's fine with me.

[1] https://www.amazon.in/s?k=amazon+brand

[2] https://www.amazon.in/s?k=amazon+basics


Merchants have laws too, you know? https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/13/technology/amazon-bezos-i... https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2020/01/29/business/corpor...

Both these companies are not even monopolies in the countries they got sued in.


"Amazon would still be in charge of enforcement"

Is this true? Based on my reading of the proposed rules, it would be the product owner who would be responsible, not the platform.

I don't think Amazon Basics or any of their other brands are participating in this sort of behaviour.

I could be wrong, though...


this has been going on for years. amazon benefits, so they allow the practice.

I think this is a pretty big deal and has been for at least a few years, yet there have been no repercussions for Amazon yet. It feels like it should be illegal to enable this kind of thing.
next

Legal | privacy