Hmmm, in the Architecture (Building) world we've had standardized contracts for over a century. They work quite well at a cost of about $5 apiece. I can see how the author, being a lawyer, is concerned by the need of fewer lawyers with standardized contracts in the startup world.
What you have highlighted is the general problem with software contract projects. The incentives for the 2 parties are not just not aligned, they’re almost diametrically opposite.
This is not the greatest analogy, but I think it gets at how hard it is to design a proper software contract.
Standard contracts make a lot of sense to my non-lawyer mind, almost like having the different kinds of open source licenses for software that have become recognizable.
I worked on aa commercial product called F3 which, among other things, implemented this type of contract specification as a subset of its functionality. Unfortunately, I'm not sure if they ever learned how to sell it well. One of the most memorable stints in my career so far.
reply