> No school means poor kids roam the street like packs of feral dogs asking for money for food around here.
I think this is possibly the single biggest long term problem we're going to face as a result of all this. Economic recessions will come and go. But missing 5/8ths of a school year is going to be absolutely devastating for this generation of kids. They will be left permanently behind without a serious concerted effort by every school district to make up for lost time. The bar (which is already dismally low) will have to be lowered further for them to graduate, and how/when will it ever be raised back again?
> Like is missing a year of 4th grade going to be a problem for anyone?
Yah. There's a whole big subset of the population that barely manages to stick with school at baseline. Educational interruption in other circumstances has been shown to have bad outcomes. We're trying to do better this time, but the school system as a whole is overtaxed.
I'm a middle school teacher. Even with best practices for remote education, I've seen all kinds of negative impacts. It's going to take a whole lot of support to get these kids to anywhere near a normal curriculum.
> But missing 5/8ths of a school year is going to be absolutely devastating for this generation of kids.
It's not. The amount of learning that happens in a typical school year is not very high. The world can skip an entire year of school, and the educational cost it will pay will not be very high.
The cost of missing a year of childcare, that school provides, on the other hand, is pretty massive.
>This comes off as dramatic. Like is missing a year of 4th grade going to be a problem for anyone? I barely remember school up until 11th grade at this point. Generations? Why is he saying that?
A year off probably won't have much impact on children with families with the capability to care for and educate them at home. This is not the case for all demographics. For some students, a year off school literally means nutritional insecurity during a time when brains are developing and the only stable environment they have is gone.
My friend is a first grade teacher and has about 5 students who are homeless. It shouldn't be a shock that they are not attending class via zoom.
>> No school means poor kids roam the street like packs of feral dogs asking for money for food around here.
In a lot of areas, schools are still open to serve breakfast and lunch to kids, school buses are dropping off food, and in states like mine, half the families are getting extra cash for food right now. Families will receive $193.80 total for March and April for each eligible K-12 student, and another $182.40 total for May and June.
> Forced attendance is imo the worst symptom of this
I taught in an inner city title one school. While it would have made teaching those who showed up easier, I'd bet that over half the students would not show up without forced attendance. We had under 2% of students who would go on to graduate a four year college and something like an 80% transitory rate (meaning 20% would complete all four years at the school - this might have been up to 95% transitory, it has been a while since I was there). Gangs, violence, and poverty and no examples of school helping anyone in their lives.
What do you do with kids in that kind of situation?
> I have a saying when my peers compare themselves to the Zuckerbergs and Gates and Musks of the world: How many hundreds of thousands of dollars did your parents spend on your education? Because you have to realize that is who you are competing with.
I went to a VERY RURAL high school. We had 3 math classes that everyone went through... none of them college level. My math class decided it was funny to rip up the floor tiles and smash them against the blackboard when the teacher's back was turned. Kids would just not do the homework and they would pass them so they didn't have to deal with them for another year.
No AP classes, no test prep to speak of. Top of the class were just the obedient kids who did the 7th-grade level homework assignments. We had a small band and it was tight-knit and fun.
I get really down on myself because I'm so far away from what I actually want to be. But did I actually have a chance? Yeah. But a small one. Much smaller than a lot of other people. And now the kind of jobs I can get are... fine I guess. Not great, just fine. I'm almost 30 and now I need to learn a ton of mathematics my peers have known for a decade.
I ended up going to whatever Chicago college would take me at an affordable rate ( DePaul ). College was hard. I worked 40 hours a week and went to night classes. I struggled through the "easy" classes and SCRAPED past on the hard classes.
Still, my early education wasn't SO BAD. At least I didn't have to worry about violence or a gang trying to draft me.
I have a crazy idea around this: End high school sooner.
Let the kids leave sophomore year, or even earlier. Let them go to trade schools.
For most of the country, school is just child jail. Why are we forcing students who WANT TO LEARN AND IMPROVE deal with students who do not want to be there, and are going to end up working at a tire plant anyway?
"But but but.. the education!" They are not getting an education anyway. The schools do not have enough resources to teach these kids. They do not want to be there. They are torturing everyone around them because they are bored.
I think there's some value to recognizing where you've come from and the hardships you faced / still are facing. But there is fundamentally a mindset of inferiority laced within your comment that is completely unnecessary and frankly just disrespectful to yourself. You say you're "almost 30" as if somehow you're another decade from death.
Forgive me if this is harsh, but I think it's important for you to hear this. You're acting like a loser right now, and if you don't change that, you're going to stay a loser for the rest of your life. Your comments about yourself and their self deprecating nature will end up 100% true if you don't snap yourself out of this nasty and grisly self-fulfilling prophecy. This doesn't have to be the case though, and it is completely up to you whether you want to continue walking down the current path you are following. Whatever your circumstances from the past, whatever things outside your control, there is one factor that you have complete sovereignty over, and that is yourself. Everyday you make a choice in how you live your life. Individually they have relatively little impact. In combination, they are quite literally the definition of what your life is, "destiny" or "fate" being some words that people often use in order to absolve their personal responsibility to the final outcome.
So what will your choice be for today?*
* A reminder that choosing to do nothing is still very much a choice.
> Point is, there is nowhere near enough teachers and resources to fix these broken kids. Their broken homes are what need to be fixed.
The problem with that is if you can't fix their environment for 8 hours a day (most schools are more like 6 these days but for argument's sake), and you propose fixing their environments 24 hours a day ...
This is not going to work for those kids.
So it depends who you want to help. You want to help disadvantaged kids? This will, certainly in the short term, make it worse for them and make life better for advantaged kids.
>The bar (which is already dismally low) will have to be lowered further for them to graduate, and how/when will it ever be raised back again?
You don't have to lower the bar. There are other options. There is no fundamental law of physics that says a generation has to graduate at age X, so we -- the society -- should be perfectly able to delay that process for a year, instead of lowering the bar.
That said, there's something deeply wrong either with the society as a whole or with the HN audience if you read "poor kids roam the street like packs of feral dogs asking for money for food" and you say that the biggest long term problem is the lowering of the bar because kids skipped school.
> No school means poor kids roam the streets like packs of feral dogs asking for money for food around here.
You don’t think that describing poor kids who cannot go to school and likely cannot afford to eat on their own as packs of feral dogs is problematic at all?
> Plenty of kids start a year late sometimes on purpose by parents to give them a leg up
Don't be ridiculous. The amount of parents that do this is practically non-existent.
> Particularly for grades 8-12, in school education is vital.
I disagree. I've worked in a top 5 largest school district for over 22 years. Under normal circumstances a handful of kids graduate high school with trigonometry under their belt, some with only algebra, and some in between (its the same for science). There's plenty of wiggle room in there. Colleges already offer remedial classes for kids that need it and its unfair to the students that managed to succeed even in this environment.
> You seem very concerned about the economy.
I shouldn't have used the word economy (as that tends to translate directly to "the stock market"). I really meant its bad for labor (but good for the companies that exploit labor).
Let me re-iterate my most important point: If everyone is held back, the dropout rate will be catastrophic for years to come.
> assuming kids are back in school September 2022, will there be lasting effects? No.
I’ve only looked at the data for literacy and its impacts on life outcomes. (I do charity in that space.) Something like being 6 months behind in third grade can materially predict high school graduation rates, SAT scores and incomes. Even if one controls for gender, race and income.
> If kids can’t get themselves to school by their teenage years, something is horrifically wrong with your urban planning.
i mean, according to the general sentiment of HN at least, there is something horrifically wrong with urban planning in the US. in the meantime, the schools need to settle on a "least terrible" schedule.
>Educational outcomes for this ~2.5 years (once this school year's over, it'll have been about that much) are gonna be really bad.
And depending on what grade the student is, that 2.5 years could have repercussions for anywhere from 6 months for the older students trying to be competitive in college, to the rest of their lives. I really, really, really am afraid for students who are just learning the fundamentals and are missing so much social/emotional/educational development.
My money says this is going to have repercussions for decades.
> But what do you do if you’re poor? Or in a troubled home?
You stop going to school. There's a teenager next door who lives in a troubled home and from talking to him it sounds like he hasn't really attended school since the beginning of 2020 because there are no consequences for not showing up in zoom and his single mom is too tired to make sure he's attending his classes or to homeschool him...
>They're going to be tracking all these kids who are going to miss months of school as a big "natural experiment".
Honestly I don't know why that would be an issue. Say you go to school for 12 years and you miss 3 months because of this. That's 2% of the total time of going to school. I doubt you will have a measurable impact in performance later in life.
Hell, I slept through most of grades 7-9. I was a teenager, always sleepy and unmotivated. Then I started catching up in grade 10 and graduated at least in the top 5% of my class.
Also you can learn so much outside school, it might even be beneficial to have your parents at home, like it used to be pre-industrialization.
> This attitude is a major reason why public education is so utterly messed up in the US. All of the social and mental work that should be done elsewhere is simply not done. Time after time, the schools (and police) are called on as the last line of defense for a failing society.
I completely agree. But we can't fix this in the next few weeks, so for now keeping schools open for those who need it is the thing to do.
I think this is possibly the single biggest long term problem we're going to face as a result of all this. Economic recessions will come and go. But missing 5/8ths of a school year is going to be absolutely devastating for this generation of kids. They will be left permanently behind without a serious concerted effort by every school district to make up for lost time. The bar (which is already dismally low) will have to be lowered further for them to graduate, and how/when will it ever be raised back again?
reply