Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Most shortages are caused by logistics, not supply.


sort by: page size:

Are you saying that shortages are not reduced by having more of the thing that there is a shortage of?

It’s not clear to me that any of the proposed causes are singly driving the shortages. The closest analogy in my mind is that our global production and logistics system is suffering from multiple shifting bottlenecks with secondary induced inefficiencies. Those new inefficiencies include JIT buffer exhaustion, related slowdowns, capacity reduction, priority inversions and resource contention.

Ah, my shortages are good, your shortages are bad. Makes sense.

Interesting. So perhaps tales of shortages are bullshit?

> How can there be a supply chain crisis and a inventory surplus?

The supply chain crisis doesn't mean nothing is being supplied. It means that there are unknowable delays in everything. Your order may be made on time or delayed for several months. Once it's on a boat, it make take two weeks or four weeks to get across the Pacific, but then it might be unloaded right away or stuck on the boat for months. Once off the boat, it could be stuck at the port for a week or get transfered to a truck or rail right away.

When faced with all that uncertainty, you're going to have times where things start moving and too much stuff shows up at once. As well as times where you don't have much to sell.


Most shortages have very less to do with productivity and alot to do with money

there is in general not shortages of anything, but you can of course envision situations in which shortages would be real.

There is such thing as a shortage, but persistent shortages are only possible due to government meddling.

Can you give me an example of a legitimate shortage then, as defined in purely economic terms?

All this article highlights is that when you don't order more, you run out. This is not political, it's simply a mismanagement of inventory, and not being prepared for a disaster where multitudes of an item will be needed.

You’re right but anyway the consequence of the supply shortage is a “mess”, more than a “mass mishaps”.

Based on what source are you saying that exactly?

Those shortages have been explained for a while by a combination of overlean JIT manufacturing(1) and supply chain issues.

(1) https://www.supplychaindive.com/news/lean-supply-chain-jit-i...


Precisely. Which causes supply shortages, and then you can't buy what you need. The whole point is to be ahead of the crowds.

The misapplication of "shortage" to describe situations where prices are functioning as expected and supply is available is one of my pet peeves.

Well we’re talking about shortages so shortages will happen because some will stockpile

Sure, but look at which category the companies complaining about shortages are in.

Hmm how do you differentiate between supply chain shortages and this scenario?

> It's impractical to keep 12 months worth of supplies for manufacturing

They didn't need to. The initial disruption was only a few weeks. The problem is that once companies saw that there would be a shortage, they started buying up all the supplies they could to rapidly build up buffers, which increases the demand for those supplies worsening the shortage, which in turn means even larger buffers are required. It's a vicious cycle that all could have been avoided.


How much of those shortages are simply from the supply chain crunch? I keep reading how that is easing.
next

Legal | privacy