Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Sorry for the confusion and late reply. I didn't catch this part of the comment. I cant edit it now. I should not have use the term "Open Source" which I agree meant something different. May be source available would be better. But the point of my argument still stand.

Please accept my sincere apology. And no offence intended.

Let hope we continue to focus and amaze at the technical marvel that is UE5.



sort by: page size:

UE5 is not open source, it is shared source or "source available". Assuming it follows the model of UE4.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Source-available_software


In open source.

Isn't it open source?

Isn't it open source?

Isn't it open source?

not open source, just source available

Oops, just realized you said open source. Sorry!

You describe source available, not open source.

It is open source?

Ah, I see, I had no idea it was open source! Thank you for the information.

Wasn't this open sourced?

No really. Many proprietary software are source available but far from being open source.

Even Microsoft Windows is source available if you are an important customer: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/sharedsource/default.aspx

A bit more public and open to anyone is Unreal Engine's source code: https://dev.epicgames.com/documentation/en-us/unreal-engine/...


Ah, my bad. Source-available, not Open-Source

Can it be open sourced?

That would be what's usually called "source available + documented" rather than open source

Isn't it open-source, though?

It is open source.

It is open source.

So it is not open source, thank you for the info.
next

Legal | privacy