Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Apparently it was 22/44 in 2013. By 2016, half-hour shows were already down to ~19mn.

Broadcast was utterly unbearable when I visited the US 20 years back, I can't imagine watching it today.



sort by: page size:

I remember there were no significant programs broadcasted during the day in NL ( ~1980 ).

Now the average adult in the US watches 5 hours a day, 35 hours a week.

Were they wrong?


In New Zealand, it was early Saturday afternoons, moving to progressively later times. For some reason, it was a low rating show...

It just isn't at all. It's still on-air in the US and much of Europe not to mention huge countries like India (where it is still heavily used) and China plus many African countries.

I think ~10 years ago was a local maximum of American TV quality, and we've been going downhill into a land of lots of shovelware.

TV in the UK is generally 50 , at least.

wow. that's absurd. I mean so full circle and more compared to last century TV.

It was quite common in the US. We Europeans always considered US TV as totally unwatchable, because of the horrible, constant ad interruption.

US TV spectrum has been halved in the last 20 years. Used to have channels 2-69 (minus 37, reserved for radio astronomy). Now it's just 2-36.

Channels 70-83 were reallocated away from TV in 1983.


It was a culture shock to me as an American that moved back to the US. Turned on regular TV only to see shows constantly interrupted by commercials. After that I put the STB in the closet and use streaming services.

It's still pretty thin compared to the US, particularly for television. There haven't been any dramatic changes since the launch.

My hunch is that over-the-air broadcasts are much less popular in the US than they were 30 years ago. A lot of Americans probably don't even know they can get digital broadcasts with a coax antenna. One group is probably paying for cable or satellite, and another, probably the one with more growth, is mostly watching stuff on phones and tablets.

Television ratings inside the US.

I remember living in the UK 20 years ago when my friend had got into Buffy the Vampire Slayer. He insisted I watch some episodes. But because the target demographic was 'nerdy night owls' on a non-prestige TV channel, they cheaped out on the conversion and by the end of each 45 minute episode the dialog had gone badly out of sync.

My friend insisted I was just imagining it, but only one of us went on to have a career doing post-production in the US market. To be completely frank I've looked down on UK/EU broadcast techs a little ever since because being able to set everything to 25fps and forget about it is easy street.


And it is wildly popular, about 1.7 million viewers (population ~5 millions), around 80% of those watching TV at that time are watching it. And it always aired at 21:00. In 1992, NRK tried to air it earlier, but they received so many calls from the public that night that they re-sent it later in the evening

We keep hearing this since late 1990s, when all programming was supposed to move to India. Not much change 20 years after.

Perhaps an evolution of the "true joke" that there are 1500 television channels and nothing to watch.

This should more accurately say "traditional broadcast TV is increasingly for old people".

There's still plenty of people watching content in the TV format, they just are not doing it from exactly 8pm to 11pm in the way that they used to.


> Sad to say that it's better viewing than almost all free-to-air TV in Australia.

and germany.


Sir, you must have grown up in front of a TV with strictly US American programming.
next

Legal | privacy