Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Just because their VC totals don't match the bay area doesn't mean that this is a small investment.


sort by: page size:

Are you based in San Fran though? Sounds like the city flowing with VC cash

It has been reported that Alameda made around $5B of VC investments. The scale of this thing is huge.

They're going to get so much VC money.

You mean VC spending here I think

Mind clarifying what funds you spoke to (VC or PE, which geographies)? Curious whether your sample size is Bay Area or elsewhere.

Raising VC funds outside of greater Bay Area is not only harder, but generally per equity traded, you get less in return. Generally, these cluster investors cluster around an asset-type, industry, jurisdiction, and proximity.

Bay Area startups raised roughly $46 billion in 2019, compared to Europe in sum raising $36 billion; if you’re raising more than $10 million, not attempting to raise funds in the Bay Area is likely poor choice.


I've always imagined it was because the VCs bought the buildings they rent out to the startups, and probably the apartments as well. That makes the bay area a big money laundering machine where cash is guaranteed to flow from the investors through the VCs to the startups and back to the VCs again. Cha-ching!

We had $84B in VC investments in 2017, the most I believe ever and the second most in SF (2015 had more) and Santa Clara county increased as well.

Source for the first part: https://venturebeat.com/2018/01/08/vcs-invested-the-most-cap...


From my experience with lots of VC money.

They are booming in VC money, they are not talking about user usages.

They're raising a lot of money because they can, because money is flowing to VCs.

> Where are the VCs getting all their money? Are mainstream banks exposed? Hedge funds? Corporations? Retirement funds?

VCs raise money from Limited Partners (LPs). Who are they? The regulars of course (fund of funds, foundations, endowments, large family trusts, pension funds, etc), but it seems pretty common for VC firms to also take on money from other wealthy individuals who made a lot of money from the machine, i.e., founders who got big exits and even other VCs or ex-VCs who likewise previously made bank.

In other words, there's a surprising amount of circulation or recycling of funds in the bay area tech scene. And that's awesome, win or lose.


It’s the VC money at work for you...

Note that the article is talking about VC-scale (think 10s/100s of million in revenue).

Guess all that VC money came with a hefty pricetag for the community.

Where are those numbers from? That nominally more money going into ICOs than startups in the Bay Area.

Startups follow the VC money. VCs usually can afford SF.

That's millions of dollars of VC funding at work for you.

VCs seem to be making a greater effort to fund startups outside the valley these days. Could explain the discrepancy.
next

Legal | privacy