Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Until enough people do that, Google still has 90%+ of the general search traffic. De facto monopoly.


sort by: page size:

Google having a monopoly on search engines is super scary and it seems no other engine has the hope of rivaling them anytime soon.

Google has an estimate 88% of the search market share in the US. (Its higher world wide if it matters.) Many people consider that to be getting into monopoly territory.

Google is a de-facto monopoly for search.

What is Google's market share? I thought it was under 70%.

It's not like they've actually had a monopoly (90%) for almost 2 decades. Furthermore, it's not like you can't trivially change your search engine in the next 2 minutes.


I don’t want to break Google’s monopoly on search. Google’s search is fantastic. It’s their advertising business knowing too much about me I care about.

Even if the search results are good, Google is still a monopoly.

Which search engine might that be? Last time I looked, Google operated a de facto monopoly.

Because search is the only area where Google has a clear monopoly.

Google holds near-monopoly position in the search engine market..

Google's Search has many competitors. Bing and Yahoo to name a few. Definitely not a monopoly.

Just because there are other websites on the internet does not mean that Google doesn't have a monopoly. They have 91% search engine market share.

That doesn't do much to break up the effective monopoly these services have in their respective markets. You split off Google Search into it's own company and they will still have 90% of the search market share when you're done.

You seem to forget that a fundamental number: while Google Search has between 68% and 80% market share in the US, it has between 90% and 95% in most of Europe. The difference between being a monopoly or not.

This doesn't seem like it's going to work. Given a choice between search engines pretty much everyone is going to choose Google. I think there are definitely areas that Google acts anti-competitively. But search? The competitors are a URL away. And few use them because Google is just flat out better.

Google does not have a monopoly on search engines. There is abundant competition in the search engine market: DuckDuckGo, Bing, Yandex, Brave, Yahoo.

Nobody uses Google because they have to, they use it because it is the best.


Because Google has such a huge market share in search that they can noticeable damage competition.

I think Google search is close to a monopoly, and so was Google Reader. Search is pretty much synonymous with Google. Apparently Google has 67% market share, but I'd guess that most people not using Google just use Bing or Yahoo! because that's the default in whatever browser they have. http://searchenginewatch.com/article/2244472/Google-Once-Aga...

Where would Google be without the PageRank patent to give them a monopoly on search? Don't think many people have an issue with that.

Google's monopoly in search is much stronger than any of the examples you cited.
next

Legal | privacy