Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

There is nothing stopping most businesses from doing that at the moment.


sort by: page size:

That won’t stop any company from doing what they want.

That doesn't stop other companies seeing it as a viable business model.

That hasn’t stopped other companies in this space.

That's true. But no one is criticising their business abilities.

It's just business for all of them. Nothing hard about it at all.

This assumes that there are no intellectual property encumberances held by the old company, and that the barrier to entry isn't terribly high. And no one with a budget and a deadline is going to wait for one company to go out of business so they can get it cheaper.

This is just a commercial entity making their own market driven choices. I see no problems, here.

It's working just as intended. If one big company points out that another big company is breaking the law and is willing to fight to prove it, I'm all for it.

A project that gets backed to 100% and can deliver on it has a viable business plan. There is nothing stopping people from selling their stuff elsewhere, in fact: that's what they should do.

If shareholders are happy with it, I guess companies have no problem.

They are doing all the time, Wipro, TCS, Infosys, HCL aren't having any shortage of customers.

I didn't question their viability as a business.

That won't stop many people from buying them.

I mean, that's a lot better than most businesses.

And as in most situations like this (vast majority), a company won't disrupt itself.

Indeed, and that's certainly reassuring; the option may still gain traction over time though, even for the most forthright of businesses.

Most companies also have steady revenue streams.

In all the ways that don't bother corporate.

A company does not need a reason to stop servicing a country. They just can.
next

Legal | privacy