Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

In previous times, I worked for a company that had the acronym AAPL. I kept getting the stock quotes for Apple every time I browse the company's intranet.


sort by: page size:

FWIW, Apple's stock symbol is AAPL.

Side-note: Apple's ticker symbol is AAPL, not APPL. It got me the first times too.

Apple's ticker symbol is AAPL.

Why are you typing $AAPL instead of Apple?

$AAPL ? Why not “Apple”?

apple, aapl, app

Mainly it gives people an opportunity to get Apple's ticker wrong (AAPL is correct, APPL is very commonly misused).

Is this a sign AAPL is over-valued? Not trying to rag on Apple here, genuinely interested.

Apple's stock ticker is AAPL not APPL

It's one of the many reasons I own AAPL shares. They have such a great following with many people who would never even consider moving away from Apple products and shun other brands. I don't see this changing for a long while.

Sometimes I think Apple's product sales numbers are being maintained by the people that bought AAPL stock in the last few years.

There's a really effective way of dealing with your discomfort about Apple's policies - don't buy AAPL. Pretty simple. I personally am long on it because I trust what the board's done over the long haul. Might change.

Buying AAPL in the early 2000s seems obvious now, but it was not obvious then. Prior to the iPhone, in the midst of a market dominated by the likes of Microsoft, a lot of people had very low expectations for Apple. The chances of AAPL beating companies like XOM or GE were not predictable at the time, and you can say the same today about any stock. At the time, you could of course argue for why AAPL would have enormous future growth, but it wouldn't be a prediction, but a bet.

So you think it's purely a coincidence that AAPL is up 3-4x in the past 5 years while Radio Shack stock has lost 99% of it's value? It has nothing to do with the fact that Apple is making huge profits while Radio Shack lost money hand over fist?

Hmmm...

"During the year of the iPhone's launch, AAPL jumped from $75 billion to $100 billion in market cap."

https://www.thestreet.com/apple/stock/1980-to-now-the-journe...


They need Apple in the sense that AAPL is represented in many different financial instruments, products and portfolios, and it tanking would have consequences outside of shareholders just losing value.

I have to insert one mild troll here: you seem to be writing in the voice of an Apple investor, yet from context you seem more like a user or developer. Why is the value of AAPL a universal good? Seems like it's quite high enough already.

Here is the change of Apple stock from 2005 to 2011:

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/hp?s=AAPL&a=08&b=7&c=...


on Dec 12, 1980, AAPL was $2.75.

The Apple I listed for $666.66 (I assume 1976)

So say that was 243 shares.

Today that would be roughly $140,000.

next

Legal | privacy