Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

The legal system provides the mechanism to address that specific category of speech.

“Defamation is an area of law that provides a civil remedy when someone's words end up causing harm to your reputation or your livelihood. Libel is a written or published defamatory statement, while slander is defamation that is spoken by the defendant.”



sort by: page size:

libel and slander are defined as writing or saying _false_ things that damage a person's reputation or property. if the damaging statement is _true_ its not libel or slander.

> Things like libel/slander. Threats. Blackmail.

Libel and slander are civil matters in the United States.


Slander, defamation?

Defamation and libel are civil offenses, meaning (in my lay understanding) a person can be held financially liable if sued but cannot be imprisoned or otherwise restricted except as far as he can be constrained to pay the judgment filed against him.

(IIRC, libel is about written defamatory falsehoods, while slander is about spoken defamatory falsehoods.)

Defamation is false speech published to others without requisite care for the truth.

Libel is written defamation. Slander is spoken defamation.


I understand that it's defamation (which combines both libel and slander) but what other differences are there?

In law, defamation (also called calumny, libel, slander, and vilification) is the communication of a statement that makes a claim, expressly stated or implied to be factual, that may give an individual, business, product, group, government or nation a negative image. It is often, but not always, a requirement that this claim be false, and, or alternatively, that the publication is made to someone other than the person defamed.

Libel is a civil matter.

Defamation is a tort. :P

Defamation.

Wikipedia:

> Defamation (also known as calumny, vilification, libel, slander or traducement) is the oral or written communication of a false statement about another that unjustly harms their reputation and usually constitutes a tort or crime


Technically since the defamation is written rather than spoken, it is libel, not slander. :-)

In some jurisdictions, slander/defamation can be criminal.

Defamation is already a civil tort. Are you under the impression that the First Amendment protects defamatory speech from being litigated as defamation?

Slander is spoken defamation, and defamation is by definition untrue statements.

So Truth isn't really a defense against a slander allegation; it's a refutation of that allegation. If the spoken words are true, they can't be defamatory, so they can't be slander.


Forgive me, but it's technically libel. Slander is spoken, libel is written.

Libel and slander aren't illegal, they're civil matters.

It's defamation if it's known to be false and spoken maliciously. Moreover, to be actionable, defamation has to actually cause damage. You're making assumptions here that won't survive your argument.
next

Legal | privacy