Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

I believe reservoirs refer to animals that can also carry the cold or virus but are not affected by government measures


sort by: page size:

What happens when the reservoir is the family dog or a free-range pet cat? Or maybe domesticated animals are less likely to get sick in the first place?

Aren't we likely to get animal reservoirs anyway with how easily it has spread to cats, etc.?

Fine.

UK eradicated Rabies. I'm pretty sure we all agree Rabies has substantial animal reservoirs, right?


Animals are host reservoirs for COVID as well, meaning the fantasy of 100% vaccine coverage also does not solve the problem.

Don't animals carry the virus as well?

Livestock and domestic animal vectors can be though.

They don't spread disease any more than dogs or cats.

You are wrong. Covid might exist in bats or deer or dogs with mild illness just fine yet kill all humans.

Don't forget that animals also get and transmit covid.

It wasn't a reasonable position since we've known cats and dogs (and everything else) could catch it. (Among other reasons, but this is the most obvious for anyone even slightly familiar with previous vaccination efforts.)

For a virus that supposedly just jumped from wild animals to humans, it'd be irresponsible to simultaneously think it couldn't happen again from any of the number of species potentially acting as reservoirs.


How we treat these animals is a blessing compared to how Mother Nature would treat them. We protect them from parasites, bacterial infections, malnutrition, rabies, predators, the weather, physical injuries and yes, ingesting things they’re not supposed to.

Yes, but last I heard the population was not considered healthy either (something about a facial cancer that can be passed from animal to animal)...so give is a few months and the statement might be correct.

while immune systems in domestic and wild animals can vary, my point was that the source of infection was more likely human caretakers. Chances of a wild mink catching covid from an infected human are probably lower than getting hit by lighting 10 times in a row

yes, and help you are not sick or infect from animal ills.

Even if the virus is transferable between species, pets aren’t a particularly worrying vector. Most pets only have contact with a few humans, and those humans usually already have contact with each other.

Places like kennels and dog parks can increase the pet to pet transmission, but if a city locks down then those opportunities decrease as well. So worrying about pets won’t change any of our current approaches.


Are you sure COVID has never been documented in animals? I seem to remember reading about cases where entire farm populations of minks were being killed. Perhaps you mean infection from an animal host to human?

Which is also nonsense.

Animals raised without antibiotics and vaccinations carry a horde of diseases.


I am not a veterinarian but there are things you can do, and that is being done (for swine flu for example), to prevent disease outbreaks in animals, also within wildlife. Primarily surveillance and control.

This line item for allowed uses from that link:

* Prevent disease in animals that are at risk for becoming sick

Is pretty much a giant loophole.

next

Legal | privacy