Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Let's just say this consent isn't exactly enthusiastic and ongoing.


sort by: page size:

It's not exactly without consent

>consent

How is that consent?

That is not consent.

It's about consent perhaps?

I wouldn’t talk about “consent” in this context.

That's very kind but it seems like consent is a ship that has already sailed in this case.

Consent.

Consent.

Consent.

Consent.

Informal consent (and lack thereof) is still consent (and lack thereof).

It appears it's with consent.

No, that's still just consent of those who consent.

Consent. You lack it.

It’s not consent, it’s legitimate interest.

Consent is important here.

You still need to ask for consent.

That's not non-free consent, that's not consent at all.
next

Legal | privacy