Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

When we were texting our tweets to Twitter a decade ago they didn’t respond with 200 random retweets.


sort by: page size:

A little while ago, Twitter only stored our last 20 tweets and discarded the previous ones. When they stopped being that much ephemeral, no one noticed.

Twitter didn't exist back then.

Aha, until I read about the SMS issue, I'd forgetten how incompetent Twitter was in the past. The whole 'scaling' debacle, etc.

They did not make many missteps. Once the general public started using Twitter by 2013, they realized it's not for them, unless they were a celebrity.

tell it to those cancelled for decade old tweets

That is how Twitter worked a decade ago. It is _very much_ not how Twitter works now.

A few years ago (eek a decade) when a lot of the tech community hung out on slashdot and I remember seeing this same thing happen. We are social creatures and before tweeting (I know shocking) there was other ways and there will be new ways when no one tweets anymore.

> it's very rare that there's a reply or conversation in even 1% of them

The interaction we used to see on Twitter is largely dead as well. Few people with followings in the thousands will engage with someone outside their small circle. Many block for trivial reasons. It's not what it was a decade ago.


I do wonder, if Twitter hadn't gone psycho on the twitter clients, if this problem would have been solved. Twitter stopped most development on this issue for anyone outside Twitter.

To be fair, the importance of those tweets in shaping the public conversation might also die because of that. In the high old days era of the 2010s I could go and read what interesting people were thinking about today on Twitter. Now if I pick a random account I know is active I see what they were saying in 2022 for some reason.

They're relying very heavily on their existing network of users if that is not some weird thing that only affects me. I'd assume most readers don't create accounts.


Twitter has no idea what they're doing and they haven't for a very long time.

They had fewer things competing for their attention. What were you going to do in those 10 extra minutes, refresh Twitter again?

Twitter's not very usable these days.

I think we lost that when public figures started having to answer for their old tweets. Interestingly, that only happened because enough people bought into the original idea for it to become a permanent thing.

Twitter was too busy navel gazing and pushing PR about how they had the ability to incite revolutions.

They were afraid to grow beyond tweets. In life you need to grow or die. Ten years from now, they'll be fondly remembered as the AOL Instant Messenger of the 2010s.


It would have been so hard to predict Twitter.

Twitter still is.

How could you have known in 2009 how the dynamics of twitter would evolve over the next decade? There's no way. I've used twitter since 2008 and if you told me then that 7 years later that the US presidents would be using it as their primary communication platform with the public I wouldn't believe you.

For most of Twitter's existence, it was a fantastic source of real-time information about rapidly-changing events. Many organizations used it to distribute urgent information, and it was totally reasonable for users to rely on that.
next

Legal | privacy