Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

There's no long-term plan.

Even the immigrant plan sucks, because there are very few countries worldwide which aren't on a trajectory to reach replacement TFR within a decade.



sort by: page size:

We are stuck with it due to the labor shortage providing no route for the massive infrastructure work required to change.

A slow fix over the next century is the goal.


The problem with such long-term plans is of course that none of the politicians who decided this today will be around in 2050.

The most relevant question is: What are they going to do in the next 1-2 years to make the first steps? That's far more relevant than any long-term goal.


This has been obvious for a long time, and it's incredibly unlikely they'll meet the new 2026 plan either.

I really don’t see how a plan without international reach has any chance of being effective.

We just survived the worst crisis of century. Perhaps it makes sense to put this plan on hold for couple of years. Or find something a bit more cost effective.

There is no future-proof statement, much less legislation.

Obviously current measures aren't sustainable for 6 months, or even 3 months.

The alternative is even less practical in the long term.

The US plan, if I’m not mistaken, is for 10k years, not 100k.

Agreed, sadly there’s no chance for the US to get this for the next 2.5 years at a minimum

All of those are long term solutions or ideas, none will be to market in 5 years.

Until the next 2008. It seems like a financial crisis would put that plan into a tailspin. And there have been a bunch of those in my lifetime. I wonder if there's anything with more permanence?

What a stretch of logic on your part. They don't offer a plan for several billion people

Our economic systems do not support that solution, and I'd bet my life on it this will never happen. In theory a lot of things are fine, reality is ugly, very ugly.

TL;DR ~20 years best case scenario. Best case scenario unlikely due to political stagnation. No solution offered.

It's sad that long-term programs just don't happen. And if they ever do happen they don't survive forever due to "austerity" measures.

By that logic there will never again be another workable alternative. Why not start now rather than wait a few decades?

It is highly doubtful that goverments could plan a century ahead.

That just simply isn't going to happen. Next plan?
next

Legal | privacy