Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Stated another way: the goal shouldn't be to build something, but to solve a problem for someone. Building should be a means, not an end.


sort by: page size:

> If your goal is to build houses

Which is the goal of Habitat for Humanity, correct?

> if it's to recruit lifetime donors

Which is not the goal of Habitat for Humanity, right? It's only a means to an end. The end is building homes for people. If that end can be accomplished by a means more efficient than "recruit lifetime donors", shouldn't it be done that way?


Your point? Sometimes people just want to build things.

Most people take "Build something people want" to mean "Pick a problem to solve and solve it well."

Most people are wrong.

"Pick a problem to solve and solve it well" focuses on the "Build" part. The important part is "people want".


> spending two decades trying to build something

maybe trying to build something (in a random faraway country, one of the many in the world) was never the objective in the first place.


Building what people want vs building what they need

You're reading that backwards. He's encouraging people to build something rather than attempt to build something for the sole purpose of selling it.

> I wanted not just to build things, but to build things that would last.

"I don't intend to build in order to have clients; I intend to have clients in order to build."

> Because someone will build tools off yours and then someone will build tools off theirs.

Is that supposed to be a reason against? Enabling further progress sounds more like a reason for, not a reason against.


He's stated previously (can't remember where) that building all that is someone else's problem (opportunity).

> Build things that people want.

That sentence has a very familiar ring to it. :)


I am hoping that was the intention of the statement; not wanting to build something because of interests doesn't mean the knowledge to build it doesn't exist.

"Build something people want."

I don't disagree. My comment was related to the notion of 'oh you can't just build things here' premise that I responded to.

He's missing a subtlety in the essay. Even if the eventual vision is ambitious, don't tackle it head-on. Start with something that looks like a toy.

"Don't try to construct the future like a building, because your current blueprint is almost certainly mistaken."


Purely Extrinsically motivated people are not going to solve the build problem.

> p&l is a silly goal when it comes to "Fuck yeah, progress!"

Is it though? We don't throw money at people for building useless shit. If you make a lot of money, it's because you helped a lot of people.


So, you too don't understand the desire just to build things?

> You don't build great things by raising money, you build great things by building them.

Maybe not...but you might latest hardware, fancy offices, etc without risking a dime. Not a bad proposition :-)

next

Legal | privacy