Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Good luck using that for a big list of strings!


sort by: page size:

I have a better idea! Let's just use strings for everything!

Or, of course, many smaller strings...

I'd rather have several strings good at different things than one size fits all string that sucks equally at many different things.

There's a lot of alternatives, none of them I particularly like best for all cases. So I won't suggest something I don't think is very good. sizeof is particularly bad however for any kind of strings.

I mean, a 64k string is plenty for your everyday string needs.

No, not for my everyday needs.


And for strings.

Strings are overrated, they should never be used until you really need them.

Few tens of strings? I'll give it a try. Just pass over the first, let's say, twenty strings in a follow-up comment. German native speaker here.

If that works for you for anything but very small strings, I want to buy your computer.

Not for us string players :)

You can look at the strings, but thou shalt not use them or even memorize them.

Why are you even making strings to begin with most of the time?

Huh, maybe I'll look into that for my own search needs. If the whole issue is people aren't paying, and this comes without all the other strings, it'd be worth it.

They're all wrong! It's just a massive array of Strings. No wonder I take so long to recall anything.

Are you adding OP's strings to the list?

Out of curiosity What would you have done for strings?

Usable strings come to mind.

Depends how many strings are attached to it.

I hope you didn't list String expertise as one of your technical skills.
next

Legal | privacy