Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Goya's CEO, this weekend, continued to push the lie that Trump was cheated out of the election which directly lead to the 1/6 attacks.

Is boycotting Goya in response to that a bad thing? Should #boycottgoya hashtags on social media be deleted, for example?



sort by: page size:

#boycottGoogle

#boycottGoogle

#boycottGoogle

There are a number of companies who have executives who make business decisions that are morally questionable. I have often said its best not to use those companies, but often it's not possible.

Boycotts are effective: I have participated in one against Australia's Kyle Sandilands. You won't always be able to do this, however.


Boycott.

Could you provide more information on this boycott? I'm not sure I've heard of it before now.

> This narrative would be compelling if

I disagree. Saying "don't like it? don't use it" is in a very real sense equivalent to advocating for unethical practices to continue - because that is what past experience shows will happen.

There are countless companies with unethical business practices, with extremely complex, ever changing ownership webs (and looking at the actual people who own the shares makes it even more complex). Figuring out which companies to boycott is much more than a full-time job, and has been shown to rarely work (e.g. there wasn't much of a boycott even in the case of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Fruit_Company#Aiding_an...) - the complexity of organizing a boycott for every unethical company is simply too great.


Boycott

It's called a boycott.

So I guess we should boycott every CEO that we don't agree with?

#boycottazure

Well, one possible point of a boycott is to send a message to the extent possible. "Infecting users will ruin your brand" is one possible message. The brand's buyers also bought its legacy.

I've heard of this but am curious, does this also apply to people calling for boycotting companies?

Clickbait title, boycotting

It's the boycott of a business model, more than of the companies who use it.

Why it is not a good option to boycott them? I'd say this is a great option to putting pressure on a corporation.

I'm not in the US and I was a bit taken aback when people on my Twitter timeline started calling for boycotts of a certain online sticker service entirely because the CEO came out on Twitter as supporting Trump a few weeks ago.

I've only seen this form of complete isolation as part of feminist "no platform"-ing (basically: actively excluding speakers because of their political views, regardless of the topic of the conference or occasion) before. But this time it wasn't simply about fringe extremists (e.g. racial supremacists) but about all supporters of the final candidate of one of the two major parties.

I hope this is the end of this practice rather than the start of something worse. Demonising half (or a third, depending on how you measure) the population is not how you fix social issues, especially if it desensitises people to slurs you will still need to label the real extremists.


It's even better idea to boycott it. Embrace-extend-extinguish may work for a big player but it will harm everyone else. We've been there before.

And, since you mentioned Fox News, look at the last tweet's date on https://twitter.com/foxnews.

Boycotts have a long, storied history.

next

Legal | privacy