Hacker Read

yjftsjthsd-h · 2021-04-15 15:27:32

https://etherscan.io/nodetracker only shows 55% on geth; I wouldn't call that a super majority.

EDIT: Actually, that page shows 15% on openethereum so we must be looking at different sources. Where did you get 11% on openethereum?

reply

psychlops | karma 1197 | avg karma 1.64 · | 2022-03-15 14:53:23

For comparison, I'm curious what the percentage is excluding Tor.

SuchAnonMuchWow | karma 544 | avg karma 3.36 · | 2024-06-13 14:29:25

I'm really interested, do you have a source for those percentages ?

I tried to look for some service provider to publish this kind of metrics, but haven't found any.

reply

Cenk | karma 1970 | avg karma 4.18 · | 2022-09-13 10:33:44

They cite this link for the 70% number, but the link itself says 52.95%: https://icannwiki.org/nTLDStats:.wiki/Parked_Domains_Percent...

TheCraiggers | karma 2782 | avg karma 4.09 · | 2014-07-03 14:06:14+00:00

I don't want to get into a semantics argument here, but:

"The proportion of nefarious types (relative to the total user-base) routinely using Tor is going to be significantly higher then the proportion of such who are not..."

He is claiming that nefarious usage is significantly higher than non-nefarious usage. That's the exact meaning of majority.

reply

xirium | karma 1008 | avg karma 1.11 · | 2008-02-08 23:05:26+00:00

That's almost 25%! ( http://www.bash.org/?2999 )

mxscho | karma 297 | avg karma 4.87 · | 2019-12-23 00:06:04

> 5% of all websites (The actual numbers are 1-3% less)

Source?

It's not even clear whether this means

- 5% of servers running

- 5% of registered domains

- 5% of user traffic

reply

clon | karma 1149 | avg karma 4.44 · | 2020-11-17 16:56:51+00:00

With 10%, I believe you are overguesstimating the share of users that know/care about CVE-s.

stuaxo | karma 5251 | avg karma 1.76 · | 2017-08-17 22:22:42

Only 72% ? This seems quite low to me, as something that is quite esoteric to non-techies.

jarek | karma 5445 | avg karma 2.08 · | 2011-08-29 21:11:38+00:00

Well, that's at least 2.8741 × 10^(-8) percent of users!

gabeio | karma 222 | avg karma 1.54 · | 2015-04-13 11:35:39

Apparently around 5% http://www.businessinsider.com/cloudflare-is-ready-to-take-o...

polkunus | karma 7 | avg karma 2.33 · | 2010-08-25 05:44:18+00:00

Based on what I've used with Digg's upcoming engine, it doesn't seem near 63% at all.

bricestacey | karma 661 | avg karma 1.52 · | 2011-11-08 08:46:33

It is within 1% across all sites. Across large sites it's 7%.

grwthckrmstr | karma 671 | avg karma 3.65 · | 2017-08-27 08:41:45+00:00

You should also look at this as % of merchants and users in the world.

Is it 10%,50%,or 0.001%?

reply

nojito | karma 3538 | avg karma 1.98 · | 2022-07-26 16:06:53

> top 1% of bandwidth

Closer to top .1% in all honesty

reply

ig1 | karma 12019 | avg karma 3.39 · | 2011-09-01 13:51:35+00:00

It's actually a little higher than 47% that if you look at the top million sites.

virtuous_signal | karma 651 | avg karma 4.34 · | 2023-05-20 10:23:14

That chart counts nginx and openresty as separate categories. If you combine them (which I think makes more sense, since a lot of openresty's adoption must come from ingress-nginx), nginx/openresty would be at 34%.

rerdavies | karma 534 | avg karma 1.34 · | 2023-03-01 23:03:28

It should be zero!

Who are the 3% of web service providers providing a web service on an unencrypted port on the open internet?!

reply

aptwebapps | karma 2230 | avg karma 2.03 · | 2013-12-19 12:40:45+00:00

You can see the top 10% if you're logged in.

jcranmer | karma 30697 | avg karma 4.25 · | 2020-03-20 22:19:08+00:00

The actual numbers seem to be in the region of 0.1%, according to Chrome telemetry, and my best attempt to read the Firefox telemetry myself.