Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Don't forget the population difference. There are a lot more people now than back then. (I intentional didn't specify world population of some subset - interesting to think about each)


sort by: page size:

There are way more people around now than there were then—the number of people alive today is comparable to the number of people who have died in the last millennium.

There's also over a billion more people in the world now... does that matter? Maybe not, but I always wonder when raw counts are compared across decades

More people have existed in the last 300 years than in the previous 10,000 years.

Get some perspective.


The last 200 years are special. We've gone from 1 billion to 7 billion people. It's hard to compare that with a period of time when there were only ~200 million people.

Not really, the World's population then was less than a quarter of what it is today.

Why? At nearly all times in history there have been more people on earth than ever before.

Millions of people if you go back a few years

In the last 70 years alone we've added over 5 billion people. In the 1800s there were vast swaths of temperate, fertile land that were basically unclaimed. Moving around was no big deal at that scale.

Now we have people everywhere (that doesn't suck; and even some places that do). We have social programs and expensive infrastructure. The world is very different now than even 100 years ago.


The population then was about 1 billion.

With 7.6 billion people, greater access to education, and more travel, how many meetings of comparable people happen today?


The human population is much larger and richer.

And to put this number into perspective: it is estimated that in the year 200, the world’s population was 190,000,000, versus 8,000,000,000 today.

A large chunk of that is simply differences in population sizes. The current US population is likely larger than the global population in 1,000 CE. Further, children used to make up a larger chunk of the population exaggerating the differences.

So, it was often possible to scale up production even more, but there where not enough customers to justify it.


For anyone interested, the world population in the 1940s was ~30% of what it currently is.

Yes but there weren't this many people for the last ten thousand years.

On the other hand, there were far fewer people who lived through it. From 3000 BC to 500 BC the global population went from 14 million to 100 million. Today there are just short of 8,000 million people, i.e. 80-570x as many. On the day Ur was founded, there were fewer people living on the entire planet than there are living in some modern cities. So in terms of the number of human stories being told, we are racing past the ancients at hundreds of times the rate. We have far more history per second than they do.

The global population has gone from 4-and-a-half to almost 8 billion humans within my lifetime. No, I don't see a difference :)

I was curious so I correlated it against world population, and it still grows a lot. from 5ish events per billion around 1500 to 100 or so per billion now. That said, record keeping biases make a straightforward comparison fairly meaningless.

There's also just more capital in the world per person, it isn't just a matter of a larger population.

Add that that humans millions years ago were not in billions as today. They were actually in very small numbers, like tens of thousands on the entire planet.
next

Legal | privacy