Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

This happened to #elixir-lang too, and they decided to move to libera.chat: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27288673


sort by: page size:

Damn. I was quite skeptical about this whole libera thing: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27208073 This kind of abuse proves that the split was warranted.

This happened with ChatGPT a few weeks ago.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35291112



Some people started early on this one in the post with the name change announcement

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29029385



This is just repeating what other sites reported in broken english (not sure if they tried some translate-and-back obfuscation?), original source had large discussion at the time: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32023868

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26284782

According to that, they blamed it on someone losing a password.


https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4315663 I guess stocktwits is next on the chopping block.

Its funny that both of these things happened at almost the same time but reminds me of the chat found earlier today https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32458744 which has some great comments regarding this and the (g)libc relationship.

Thanks for also pointing this out.


I don't think you were working for this company, but this infamous case study was also a pivot to chat bots:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10662128


Exactly.

Read my comment I left there couple days ago. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5976087


Hey, if you made your post from my post[1] with ChatGPT, I feel flattered :D

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36152012#36162190



Offer three days ago for people to improve their accent:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6304783

(I'm not affiliated.)


Here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10916731

I believe the title was changed afterwards to better reflect the article's content. You can see lots of comments that think it's a chat app.


no, this was a clean chat. i found someone here who hit the same thing : https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37054241

That's unfortunate for them, because while they may not have been the users they wanted (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12306284) there were literally millions of them.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27440032

But feel free to look up any older thread on the language. It’s the musk of PLs.


They reused the URL from their closing announcement (old discussion here: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1095424 ) presumably to correct the "wrong impression" people might have got from the old text.

What are these people playing at?

next

Legal | privacy