Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

In the business world it doesn't take much to exert a big influence on a company.


sort by: page size:

In a smaller company even a junior person can have impact. It's more of a reflection of being a cog in the wheel of a large "soul less" corporation...

I like the Elad Gil take on this issue: at big companies, you can have more /impact/, for the reasons you state.

At small companies, you have more control. That's in the high-growth handbook. :)


I would argue that it is more about having the power to make a big difference

The biggest difference I ever made was while working for a big established 10k+ employee firm. The smallest was while working for 10-15 employee startup.


Which man matters more than the company's size.

Small companies don't generally change the world until they become big companies.

I can’t speak for larger companies, but classic organizational theory is that there are three levers of influence in an organization - relationship, expert, and role. I’ve found it much easier to leverage relationship and expert power at smaller companies than larger companies. I insisted on a nice sounding title when I was brought in to lead a project at a large company just for that reason. I needed role power.

I insisted on not having a grand title at a small company because I thought it would lead to resentment and I knew I could leverage the other two levers.


A small pivot for a big company is no small thing.

Yeah, most small businesses are impacted far more by overall market forces than they are by local competition. Even at large corporations in big industries though, individuals talk across companies. A lot. I've heard of major product launches from major companies in a fiercely competitive market because one CEO had lunch with another CEO and they shared their plans with each other. It's usually in the context of "This is what we're doing and we think we can beat you."

At the end of the day, even CEOs of large companies are only hired guns. They may be in a position later on down the road where they need a senior executive to run a charitable foundation, be a board member on a company they invest in, or to take the reins of their company when they retire. Always remember that there is the person and the role. The role gives them power, but the person is more valuable.


Would there be article if company in question would not be as large/influential?

Impact is in the eyes of the beholder, how much impact to you have on company direction or product decisions in a large org?

There is also a distinct lack of bureaucracy and politics in small orgs compared to large orgs


That's not optional when you are running a company of this size.

At large companies, a deal that small could be approved by tons of people. At that point, you don't even need a real decision maker.

Except 1000 impressions for a smaller company might still be impactful.

For sure. Big industry names don't assimilate; they mold their environment to what they know (and they usually bring other people with them who come from the same place). Because of their clout, few will dare to disagree with them.

It is amazing how quickly a company's ecosystem can change when you bring in a big name from a different environment.


This is just a big company thing. The larger the company, the less impact any single individual typically has.

A number of reasons but usually focus. It's amazing how distracting even moneymakers that aren't core to the business are to big businesses.

It's a weird world where a company that does billions in annual revenue isn't considered big.

Successful companies are mostly that due to having made the right business decisions, these come mostly top down. You can have a million workers, but if they don't have great leadership they'll produce basically nothing of great value.

As someone who has worked in many companies of various sizes, it's more manager dependent than size of the company dependant.
next

Legal | privacy