Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Relevant case law: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tinker_v._Des_Moines_Independe...

IANAL and would butcher the explanation, so check out the Decision section.

reply



sort by: page size:

[EDIT - removed - it seems I couldn't tell the difference between what was being overturned and the actual decision]

This is a case where being able to provide a bit of context for the link would be useful.

reply


Thanks for the pointer. It also says...

> However, the Court also held that the regulation would apply only to the institution's financial aid department, not to the school as a whole.

reply


The SCOTUS has nothing to do with this. It is the Iowa Supreme Court.

Related ruling from earlier this year:

https://statecourtreport.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/iowa-...

reply


Link to decision: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-235_n7ip.pdf

reply


Link to ruling:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-124_8nk0.pdf

reply


Direct link to the ruling: http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca8/16-...

They don't link to it in the article. This should be the link, it has a summary of the ruling with it.

reply


Ruling: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/19-1392_6j37.pdf

reply


I recommend reading the actual opinion of the court [1]. You'll get a much better understanding than you'll get from reading Techdirt's poor attempt to explain it.

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5231292758069676...

reply


This is a pretty useless article. Here is the ruling:

http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/14-1373_83i7.pdf

reply


link to the case: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20-255_g3bi.pdf

reply


Whups, link should have been to the decision: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-556_3204.pdf

reply


Is anyone a little more versed in US law able to explain what kind of precedent this sets for further cases in Iowa or I'm guessing to be nation wide due to the judge being federal?

reply


Presumably you are referring to California vs Greenwood. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/486/35/

reply


It is a court decision. Citing the actual law and context for it.

reply


Here is the ruling: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/20-1199_hgdj.pdf

reply


This is the district court ruling:

http://courtweb.pamd.uscourts.gov/courtwebsearch/mowd/BNJpmR...

reply


Perhaps what you're getting at was addressed in the Supreme Court case District of Columbia v. Heller: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_v._Heller

reply


Sorry, that's not standard terminology, I just used it because the case was discussed elsewhere in the thread. See the 5-point test here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Dakota_v._Dole#Decision

reply


Actual Ruling: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-411_3dq3.pdf

reply

next

Legal | privacy