Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

> the FBI were allegedly complicit in DDoS (distributed denial-of-service) attacks on the websites of several Iceland government institutions. The FBI had then approached Icelandic authorities, promising to assist them in preventing any future such attacks

What's really stunning that this statement does not seem like just a wildly crazy accusation.



sort by: page size:

source of quote: https://www.wired.com/2014/09/the-fbi-finally-says-how-it-le...

additional: https://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2014/10/10/fbis-warrantless...

> If the server uses full-disk encryption, and if it's well locked down, it would be nontrivial to secretly access and copy the server's data.

OP's article mentions this, part of the reason they move out of the US is because RAM can be trivially read even if full disk encryption is used. Reading RAM still works in Iceland.


>The evidence mentioned here are the addresses of the Command and Control servers. But the author does not give any reason for why he or she thinks this is the thing the FBI is being cryptic about?

The fbi and several other sources publicized the select portion of the code base that linked the ips to shamoon. Presumably, the piece the fbi is being cryptic about is the servers behind the proxy, which, as mentioned, it probably isn't too much of a stretch to guess the government might be able to trace.


> In cases like this I also imagine CF cooperates with FBI investigations.

Seems to be the case,

> The FBI’s Anchorage Field Office and its Los Angeles-based Cyber Initiative and Resource Fusion Unit investigated this matter. [...] Cloudflare, Inc. [...] assisted this investigation.

https://www.justice.gov/usao-cdca/pr/illinois-man-sentenced-...

Edit: And for anyone looking for the affadvit reference by parent, I believe they mean this: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.73...


> during which time he sent himself, through a so-called “subversion repository,”

i just can imagine how every FBI agent jumps when reading that there is a whole repository of subversion (or subversions?) out there.


>>> the FBI sent specific KV Botnet commands to compromised routers to collect "non-content information about those nodes.

This must’ve been so fun for whomever individual(s) working on this from the FBI.


> Its worth reminding ourselves about Stuxnet, they still havent caught those people, but lots of assumptions exist. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fqk_VUMzY_M https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDH4m6M-ZIU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CS01Hmjv1pQ

I thought it was widely known that stuxnet is very likely if not certainly a join NSA and Israel operation.


> Computer-security experts believe that intelligence agencies have been doing this sort of thing for years, both with the consent of the software developers and surreptitiously.

What ever happened with that thing a few years back where some in the OpenBSD community were claiming the FBI was attempting to insert a backdoor?[1][2] I was always surprised with how little media attention that seemed to get.

1: http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/allegations-openbsd-back...

2: https://cryptome.org/2012/01/0032.htm


It's a shoddy story. Quote: "Our sources told us the hackers had gained access giving them the ability to intercept ALL INTERNET TRAFFIC going to several countries in the Middle East" Way back, I used to work with dissidents/journo's/academics against censorship and surveillance at various countries. All but Turkey where easy because I recall that it was the military being in full control; playing with BGP among other things. This makes the quote a bit awkward. Why would they gain abilities already possessed & put their cards open on the table ?

> Why is it so rare to hear about Western cyber-attacks?

Because they claim stuxnet was made by Israel. Deny, or pass the buck. We didn't do nothing, move along citizen.


> That North Korea would be the prime suspect in a case of cyber-crime might to some be a surprise.

Really? This is actually well-known (atleast amongst security agencies) [1][2]

[1] https://www.ft.com/content/cbb28ab8-8ce9-11e9-a24d-b42f641ec...

[2] https://www.business-standard.com/article/international/cybe...


>credibility of the ransomware group

Hilarious.


> Those changes make sense

The FBI now even hacks thousands of computers in hundreds of other countries. Still make sense?

EDIT - Here you go:

"The FBI ended up hacking some 8,700 computers in 120 countries."

From: https://motherboard.vice.com/read/us-judges-can-now-sign-glo...


> the broadened hacking conspiracy continues to allege that Assange conspired with Army Intelligence Analyst Chelsea Manning to crack a password hash to a classified U.S. Department of Defense computer.

Can you imagine the euphoria in the moment they cracked the hash? Feels like something out of a Nicolas Cage movie.


> bureaucracies tend to do extremely stupid stuff when looked at from the outside but every cog on the inside thinks that its action makes perfect sense.

If this is Chinese doing, the likely ones responsible are the Chinese Intelligence, not their bureaucracy.

> Evidence?

Occam's Razor. I find it hard to believe that a society with sufficient level of sophistication to obtain $9 trillion GDP[1] would 'accidentally' go on to declare cyber war on US. Especially considering the fact that the attack itself was pretty sophisticated.

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_%28nom...


> Dotcom built Mega so it was technically impossible for anyone, including the site’s operators, to know what content users had stored. It means one result of the FBI’s action is the creation of a rogue website which exists outside the intrusive surveillance technology exposed by Snowden.

Are these claims accurate?


> it's recently happen to owner of local cybersecurity company Group-IB

Charged with treason for aiding foreign intelligence agencies, odds are he was working with the FBI and is guilty as charged.

Group-IB was kind of famous for causing problems, it’s surprising it took as long as it did for the government to crack down.


> FBI warns hacking spree on government agencies is a “widespread problem”

Another “widespread problem” is government agencies conducting mass surveillance.


> some big conspiracy theory that multiple cyber security agencies, all the three letter agencies, and multiple news agencies are in on.

So...Operation Mockingbird?


> it's probably hacked by most of the agencies

umm... citation needed?

next

Legal | privacy