Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

I don't know if your comment is serious or not but conspiracy theorists don't work like that. If any influencer publically changed their mind they would only be disavowed as a turncoat or thought to be under duress from TPTB.


sort by: page size:

I think there is a difference between someone who is causally stating an opinion, and someone who has fully subscribed to a specific conspiracy theory.

What happens if the conspiracy theorist is someone you agree with? Do we still avoid mainstreaming them?

The definition of "conspiracy theorist" in practice is just someone the listicle writer or tweet author doesn't like.

The point I’m making is that no matter what you do, a conspiracy theorist is going to twist the narrative to fit their world view.

As insane as this sounds, we've seen time and again that conspiracy theorists are fundamentalists. It's like trying to convert a Taliban member to Christianity. It is not going to happen no matter how hard you try with soft methods.

Anyone who propagates conspiracy theories are conspiracy theorists. Who they works for is completely irrelevant.

There are charlatans making a lot of money selling conspiracy theory content.

Conspiracy theorists are not usually great minds.

Real farmacy? Seriously? They spread conspiracy theories

How do you know if someone is a conspiracy theorist? Don't worry, they'll tell you.

I’ve never met anybody who takes conspiracy theories seriously. I think it’s the media, sadly, blowing it out of proportion, and that most conspiracy theorists are in it for the for kicks

There's a difference between views you disagree with and conspiracy theories.

I wouldn't lump conspiracy theorists in with the others because conspiracies abound. There will be good theories and bad ones but you cannot dismiss all theories outright.

> These days, conspiracy theorists seem to be some of the most open to manipulation folks out there.

"Conspiracy theories" are narratives counter to the status quo.

Arguably more people are "manipulated" into following the status quo.

Thus, I would argue that "conspiracy theorists" may be the least likely folks to be "manipulated."


"I'm sure plenty of people would be a lot less conspiracy-minded"

I think that is a ridiculous statement. The conspiracy-minded folks will be that way regardless of objective reality.


If they haven't been blacklisted for spreading conspiracy theories, they now probably should be.

Conspiracy theorists are usually impervious to evidence. They'll simply adjust their stories.

Being a conspiracy theorist doesn’t make you wrong, it means you believe that the likely motivations or interests of various parties are likely the actual cause of the observed behavior, even when there is no proof.

Here, news outlets probably would have been motivated to carry the “hope” story even if they knew it was false, because money. A conspiracy theorist would believe that because the news outlets probably would have been so motivated, then they probably actually were so motivated.


Something I learned a decade ago was that facts often don’t change people’s mind.

Before I learned that, I would try to change other people’s views with facts. Now, I don’t try so hard since I know it won’t make any difference. Love the conspiracy believer for their other qualities and ignore their crazy ideas.

next

Legal | privacy