Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

How many of those were infected and recovered in the last 18 months?


sort by: page size:

Historically it was about 1. Presumably it has been a little larger with this outbreak.

Something that you might consider looking at when comparing countries or areas is the ratio of active cases to recovered. A higher ratio suggests that the epidemic is in an earlier stage.

Sweden has about 23 active cases for each one recovered. The US is about 10:1, Europe overall is about 2:1, so is Italy, and Spain is close to 1:1. Asia as a whole is about 1:1.


> pessimistic estimates put it at less than six months

If that were the case we would see large amounts of re-infection, since the pandemic started over a year ago


Indeed, I am basing my confidence on the trendline in the graph on page 13. The number of people infected (41K) is about two thirds now as compared to the peak (58K), and the CFR is dropping exponentially as cases resolve.

They progressed a lot recently and few days ago there was about 80% done. Although, now it's 75 again due to COVID-19

It's from mid November. Since then, at a near 200k/day rate, another 10M+ diagnosed cases have been recorded.

In other words: that article extrapolates from the CDC report of 10 million cases in November, and that is now sitting at around 23M. If anything, the estimate should be way above 70M.


? That shows that covid took a huge swipe at them. Which is not really a surprise to anyone.

The numbers for this year look to almost be back to where they were? I'm not clear what the evidence you are showing is actually showing?


not sure what you are getting at,

having 10x more infections yet the situation is still manageable is actually pretty good news


Also worth noting that incidences of other infectious disease also went down, which has to be included in the math here.

Thanks. That's a good example.

Three months ago deaths were doubling every 2 to 3 days. That's some of the little data we really have. Same virus (although there are speculations that perhaps now there are multiple forms). We're being more careful about transmission ... except when we're not. We seem to be better at treatment. Vulnerable population is unchanged.


100k was estimated to be infected by early March.

Interesting that it's not a full year. I wonder if the numbers will be significantly different after more time has passed (i.e. 'the flu season')

more than 80k confirmed cases world wide, and two with a secondary infection.

Today over 224,000 cases worldwide were reported as recovered since yesterday, the second largest single day rise.

Data is good.


With time it makes sense to report the number of current cases as the cumulative number includes more and more people who are now cured.

I‘m in a city of 3.5 Million that saw 15 to 20 new infections per day over the last week (Berlin, Germany). At that level, it’s perfectly possible to mostly open up again and still reduce infections further by extensively tracking every single case and their contacts.

To further put things into perspective, here the daily number of infections have gone from a few hundred up to 5.000.

And this was before Omicron was known.


The wave has mostly subsided in South Africa, somewhat subsided in New York and other places. Far from everyone was infected.

This study was conducted over 10+ years, the COVID numbers are probably per case, or possibly annualised.
next

Legal | privacy