Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Consider naming and shaming?

(Assuming libel law where you are couldn't bite you. If it could, please don't)



sort by: page size:

(Technically, it'd be libel, not slander. Libel is written, slander is verbal, and we write on the Internet.)

Pedantry aside, I also don't think it's appropriate to name names. There's too much risk of not getting the full story when you name & shame on a public forum, and it can have very real consequences for people's lives. If you wouldn't want 4chan or SomethingAwful doing it to you, don't do it to someone else.


Threaten to sue for libel.

Sue them for libel. As a public figure, I am almost certainly able to bear the burdens of protracted litigation then they are.

(It's one of the reasons why people think twice about accusing the guilty.)


Can you sue them for libel then?

Sue them for libel.

I'd guess that in many jurisdictions, some libel law could be used to slap them if the story names individuals or (some places) corporate entities.

This probably would require the mentioned parties to sue, though - so no luck if it is a fake news story portraying someone in a positive light.


How do you avoid libel?

Libel?

You can if its defamation.

Just sue them for damages. It's libel.

In some countries that would be Libel.

Sue them for libel then?

Would this be covered under libel?

Wouldn't that be classed as defamation?

Maybe libel?

I wonder if someone could bring a libel suit against the company in your example.

Could this be considered libel?

If you sue successfully you can get a legal order to take down the content as part of the judgement.

Libel, slander, and harassment are all crimes or civil offenses (illegal). They work pretty well.


Yes, do that. There's absolutely no second order effects that could possibly happen. We'll just go to the courts for everything. I'm sure it's easy and inexpensive to sue someone for libel in different jurisdictions.
next

Legal | privacy