Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Yep they’ll just quietly backdoor it in next time.


sort by: page size:

I doubt that. They haven't backtracked on this at all.

There is a non-zero chance they realize they fucked up and backpedal on this.

Maybe they’ll manage to un-break news.

They will replicate the results, quietly implement a different protocol and never talk about it again for sure.

Calling it now: they will backpedal the next day and will say that it was a mistake or accident.

Next time, they will...

I just hope they don't expect it back later.

Actually, I'm not even sure if they will go through and treat themselves like a normal breach. But it will be a jerk move if they don't, and funny/ironic if they do.

They will try again.

I don't think they will. Doing so would feel like admitting their mistakes, so it's more probable they'll double down.

back down until they find a sneaky way to reintroduce it. IMO, case closed. Just a matter of time

That's exactly what they are going to do. They know that the outcry won't duplicate itself over numerous iterations, and they'll slip it by when people turn away for a moment.

Somehow I suspect they'll try again.

I have a feeling they won't, and will just solve the problem technically. It's how security is done.

More likely than not, they'll just move the goalposts farther and find a different excuse for not getting it.

I wonder if they will claim that "it was a mistake, a bug". Otherwise, it should backfire them heavily.

Well hopefully they don't, y'know.

I seem to recall they initially did not, and there was a massive outcry about it, so they relented.

Sounds like one of those things that they will try to sneak back in every odd years or so, and if the masses miss it just once it's game over.


Nah, if it's already reverted, they're good to go. A post-mortem with how something like that got through will definitely be on the table though.
next

Legal | privacy