I'm having a hard time believing this is true. The language in the bill itself is totally indecipherable (to me), but the only people claiming it would be a huge burden have a clear ideological or political bias.
Is there any other source who speaks this dialect of legalese and has concluded that that's what the bill would do? Have the bill's sponsors had a chance to explain the bill?
It would be nice if you edit your original comment to note that you are not talking about what is in the bill, merely what ought to be. It's misleading as is.
After reading the text of the bill I'm full of indifference towards it. Can you expand on why you think it's a bad law? I'd like to know because I'm probably missing an angle.
Oh! I hereby stand corrected. I should have said (and checked) that the provision as described is useless. I know there's reason for cynicism when it comes to Congress, but maybe I'm overdoing it. Thanks for the link!
reply