Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Yes that’s another part of the dynamic. The nuts form ready made living straw men to criticize to avoid engaging with more challenging arguments.


sort by: page size:

Strawman argument is straw-like.

Is knocking down straw men a regular thing for you?

that's an interesting take, what would you consider strawman arguments in the article?

They’re employing classic straw man argument

Or maybe they're strawmen!

One might think that it ceases to be a straw man when someone rushes to defend it.

Ahem, straw men arguments?

Why do some people engage in straw man?

That would be what is called 'attacking a straw man'

What’s with the strawman arguments?

I've been told many times that strawmen make effective arguments.

Isn’t that a glaring strawman argument?

I’ve heard that called the “weak man” as opposed to the straw man. Almost all debate I hear is against the weakest or nuttiest form of an argument.

Straw men?

I've noticed that many commenters on this insightful orange website like to bash on strawmen extrapolated from the headline or intro paragraph. They seem to think that this will make them come across as a critical thinker.

> Strawman

> strawman

> strawman

And that's what we call "strawmanning".
next

Legal | privacy