No. The arbitrary definition of 'money' being used by the article is the UK's M4 (https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/statistics/details/further-d...). This basically includes bank accounts along with any cash held outside banks. Since Alice isn't a bank, her IOUs don't count.
Not being backed by 'hard assets' is not the same thing as being backed by 'nothing.'
Generally this belies a serious lack of understanding of where money comes from and where it derives its value.
If I go to the bank, and borrow money for a house in the form of a mortgage, then new money is created. An obligation to repay that money is also created. That obligation to repay is collateralized by my house. In this case, the new money that was created was in fact backed by hard assets.
More generally the value of money is derived from an obligation to repay the debt that created it, and the legal system and framework which enforces it.
reply