Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

and that discredits him somehow?


sort by: page size:

Whoa. That surely discredits him.

So what? Does that automatically make everything he exposed false?

Could you please give some examples where he was misleading and how?

How does that make him/her less credible?

Maybe the article is a decoy and what he said is not how he did it.

And he didn't prove that he actually did it at all. I will trust him on that given his reputation but the information in the article is so vague and basic that if we solely rely on that thin evidence literally everyone can claim the same.

He claims many things, but as we have learned, it's best not to believe what he claims.

That is his claim, but he is lying.

What did he misrepresent?

That he was misrepresented?

What are your credentials to say that his statements aren't the truth?

It makes him more of a liar through his inconsistency of ethics.

That doesn't make his claims any less fraudulent.

He must get dozens of false claims of this as well, I'd have thought.

What delegitimizes him is that he is a notorious lier.

His proof has been shown to be fake.

He has used that speculation to kind of refute other people's different speculations. So he did more than just report it... he bought into it and used it to tell other people they were wrong.

That article really makes him out to be a serial liar and sort of a con-man.

So when he says:

> The accusations that I am aware of are unsubstantiated falsehoods

Does he mean that people got mad at him for the three points you listed and started inventing stories about him as a result, or is he flat out denying those things happened at all?

next

Legal | privacy