Hacker Read

Ansil849 · 2022-03-13 17:46:14

The relevance is that the NYT has a sordid history of user hostile actions, and this is just the latest in a long line of them. In other words, the relevance is in highlighting that this is kind of conduct is part of a pattern, not an aberration. This is relevant, as it helps situate the action.

madeofpalk | karma 21444 | avg karma 3.75 · | 2019-01-19 14:45:57

What's the relevance of this? The article points this out, no?

bad_user | karma 29557 | avg karma 3.94 · | 2020-03-16 20:29:53+00:00

Yes, so what's the relevance?

yellow_lead | karma 6150 | avg karma 4.38 · | 2022-04-07 12:03:19

What's the relevance?

pertymcpert | karma 715 | avg karma 0.93 · | 2018-07-13 02:56:06+00:00

What's the relevance?

simonjgreen | karma 1854 | avg karma 4.24 · | 2021-02-27 12:43:11+00:00

What's the relevance?

jjeaff | karma 13640 | avg karma 2.31 · | 2018-01-31 08:59:04

What's the relevance?

thrdbndndn | karma 2974 | avg karma 3.0 · | 2024-04-13 07:05:19

And it's relevant to the article because?

CincinnatiMan | karma 620 | avg karma 2.72 · | 2021-08-27 17:18:38

What is the relevance of this?

dirtyid | karma 1887 | avg karma 0.8 · | 2022-02-26 16:33:16

What is the relevance of this?

rebuilder | karma 3687 | avg karma 2.71 · | 2020-09-21 16:27:51+00:00

What is the relevance here?

alexilliamson | karma 650 | avg karma 2.03 · | 2020-10-30 21:58:42+00:00

What is the relevance here?

zodiac | karma 1889 | avg karma 2.3 · | 2016-09-21 23:54:20