The increase of the taxable value of residential properties is capped at 5% (or inflation if it is lower). When a property is sold, it resets to the assessed value.
The 2x factor increases the taxes paid by people who own properties with a taxable value less than the assessed value.
The property tax rate is capped at 1% (plus some small extra.)
The property value is reassessed with change of ownership. Yearly increases in assessed value are limited to no more than 2%.
My property tax is 700$/year and the yearly increase is capped. I already pay less in tax than what my house is assessed at because of the cap. If I paid the assessed value my taxes would be ~800$/year.
In terms of inflation? Owning the house has already made that a lot less painful.
I think you mixed up the numbers. It's capped at growing property value evaluations to 2% a year and counties may only set a property tax at 1% of assessed value. Of course that's only for the ad velorem portion of property tax. My city has fairly high fixed tax components (one of which scales by property square footage) which puts me currently 1.4%, and I expect that to increase over time as the fixed components to my property tax don't seem to have any restrictions. For homes of lesser value I'm sure the fixed costs dwarf their ad velorem components.
~2.8% for me! And that pie gets bigger every year, even with appraisal protests, my property value is outpacing inflation (9% gains per year). Income taxes are relatively fixed to your salary at least. My property tax (and sales tax) bill grows annually.
It still applies to all residential property. On sale, the tax rate is set to 1% of the sale price, and increases are limited to 2% per year. This creates the incentive to not sell, even if you have way too much house (e.g. empty nesters) because you may significantly increase your tax burden by downsizing.
I believe in some states, there's a limit to how much the tax-assessed value can increase in a year. So even if the housing prices double, they may only be able to increase taxes by a couple percent.
Oregon's real estate taxes are modeled after California's. They are capped at 3% increase per year (in taxable value, increases in individual levies can lead to more than a 3% increase year over year).
My house is about 10 years old and I pay ~1.5% of it's resale value in taxes annually. Granted, that's much higher than my neighbor who occupies his childhood home built in the 1960s but it's hardly outrageous compared to other parts of the country.
One difference in OR, in addition to selling a home, a significant improvement (ie adding an additional bedroom) can lead to a resetting of the taxable value at current market value.
You don't pay increasing property tax as the value appreciates. Property taxes on average increase with inflation, not with house prices. Only if your property appreciates more quickly than others do you end up paying more.
Kinda similar here in Oregon. Doesn't really get passed on when the property is sold but if you were lucky and got a place when it was cheap, the recent value jumps haven't screwed you. Assessed values can only increase 3% per year. Not only that but we effectively have a 1.5% cap on real market value (if I understand it right, taxes are confusing as hell).
Sure, but property taxes are usually in the 1%-2% range, whereas capital gains taxes are currently in the 15%-23.8% range, with proposals to increase them to 28.8% or even 43.4%.
Property taxes are capped to the level they were at the time of last sale.
So, if you bought 20 yrs ago, you pay taxes for the purchase value at that time.
Re-adjustment is done when selling or after you finished an addition.
Sort of. The California property tax bill has many line items, one of which is "General tax rate". That's the one everyone talks about and it is 1% of the assessed value. However, all applicable jurisdictions can (and thus, will) add all kinds of add-on percentage fees to the property taxes and those are not subject to any limitations.
My property tax bill (California) which I just paid two weeks ago, was actually 1.4% of the assessed value.
> that value can only go up 2% a year (i.e. way less than market)
True on average over long term. Good to keep in mind though that it goes up 2% every year regardless of market. So when the market is up double percentages like 2020-2021, it only goes up 2%. But when the housing market crashes, it also goes up 2%. Which is fine, it's basically a damping function so that instead of having the taxes swing wildly up and down year to year, they just go steadily up.
Also be aware that the 2% increase is on the "general tax rate". The additional fees which are included in the property taxes, those have no cap on increase rates.
There have been many years when my property taxes have gone up quite a bit more than 2%.
I feel that because the housing market has been on such a long bull run, people have either forgotten, or are too young to have experienced, that housing markets can also crash hard. Having an increased zestimate value of your home is not actual wealth unless you sell it, and the valuation on paper can evaporate any moment when the next housing crash comes. I've been through three market crashes in my current house, two of which left me underwater for a few years.
The ideal way to tax the increase of property value is at a liquidity event (ie sale) when the owner has the cash, and limit the cash required of the owner just because there's a bubble. That's kind of how capital gains on stocks are cashed.
Many localities apportion property tax out of the budget, so if everyone’s property doubled in price but the budget only went up 2% - property taxes would increase 2%.
In fact, we had a reappraisal recently and my value went up and total tax went down.
The 2x factor increases the taxes paid by people who own properties with a taxable value less than the assessed value.
reply