Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Should have just said toxic humanistic traits


sort by: page size:

Should just have said toxic traits. Leave out the unnecessary elaboration because it contributes nothing and can detract from the point.

I don't really blame them, and I think any group would feel the same to hear one of their personal attributes referred to as intrinsically 'toxic'. If we simply described the personality traits that we meant, we might actually get somewhere (but, from everything I've seen, getting somewhere is not the objective).

AKA "Humans are toxic"

The word 'toxic' is toxic.

Being toxic is not an admirable trait.

The progressive definition of a toxic person is someone who doesn't profess progressive principles at every opportunity. It's sort of like how Muslims think Jews are toxic.

oh you said toxic.

Toxic how?

Toxic how?

Toxic

Yeah I shouldn't have used "toxic", it sets off people's SJW alarm

Either way it's a toxic worldview, really.

Be toxic.

Best to get ahead of the curve and self-identify as toxic.

These days, any argument featuring the word "toxic" is very likely flawed and should be ignored. There's far too much moralizing and far too little understanding going around.

Intellectual impoverishment is but one side-effect.


By toxic, of course, you mean "not devoid of emotion"?

Can you rephrase that in less toxic terms?

Toxic?

That's the problem with the weak popular vocabulary. 'Toxic' can mean just about anything.
next

Legal | privacy