Hacker Read
top
|
best
|
new
|
newcomments
|
leaders
|
about
|
bookmarklet
login
ncmncm
2022-06-15 11:26:51
|
next
[–]
update item
(on:
Nuclear Is Back on the Table for a Green Future
)
There is absolutely no need for batteries to provide for storage, so that is a misleading assertion.
reply
Loading...
sort by:
oldest
newest
similarity_score
page size:
10
20
50
100
ncmncm | karma 13951 | avg karma 1.02
|
2022-02-24 16:52:59
|
next
[–]
similar comments
(on:
Nuclear-fusion reactor doubles record for energy made from fusing atoms
)
It is dishonest to pretend batteries are the only viable storage method.
reply
matthewmacleod | karma 17455 | avg karma 4.64
|
2016-11-22 13:10:28
|
next
[–]
similar comments
(on:
2016 Retina MacBook Pro Caveats
)
There is no practical impact on modern batteries from being constantly connected to power.
reply
pfdietz | karma 12357 | avg karma 1.45
|
2019-07-13 12:53:00+00:00
|
next
[–]
similar comments
(on:
Molten Salt Reactors
)
I hope you aren't making the assumption that storage = batteries, then arguing because weeks and months of batteries would be needed, it's impossibly expensive.
reply
nickik | karma 5493 | avg karma 1.17
|
2021-03-13 03:28:18
|
next
[–]
similar comments
(on:
CA crews handle tricky fire at Tesla factory
)
This has literally has nothing to do with batteries.
reply
bee_rider | karma 16765 | avg karma 2.35
|
2024-06-12 21:02:15
|
next
[–]
similar comments
(on:
Cheapest source of fossil fuel generation is double the cost of solar
)
Storage requirements are workload dependent. If your load can be deferred, you don’t need batteries.
reply
thaumasiotes | karma 22020 | avg karma 1.35
|
2015-07-14 12:45:19
|
next
[–]
similar comments
(on:
Nexus 4 battery bloating
)
A battery is very literally power storage. That's its only purpose.
reply
fallingknife | karma 5335 | avg karma 2.24
|
2021-03-04 23:09:20+00:00
|
next
[–]
similar comments
(on:
Nuclear power must be well regulated, not ditched
)
No one is using batteries at a large scale at this point.
reply
mhb | karma 38136 | avg karma 5.79
|
2016-01-27 20:31:55
|
next
[–]
similar comments
(on:
Apple Safari users suffer crashes
)
Ah. I wasn't thinking of batteries.
reply
otabdeveloper4 | karma 2720 | avg karma 1.13
|
2022-11-17 13:03:25
|
next
[–]
similar comments
(on:
Largest EU economy can reach 100% ‘clean energy’ by 2035
)
"Batteries" is not an energy source.
reply
numpad0 | karma 6056 | avg karma 1.35
|
2020-09-26 13:48:39+00:00
|
next
[–]
similar comments
(on:
Let's talk about safety of Pinephone
)
There is virtually no batteries without ICs, and, that has nothing to do with whether the device runs without a battery. That’s just a design choice.
reply
AtlasBarfed | karma 4354 | avg karma 1.01
|
2020-04-15 00:56:31+00:00
|
next
[–]
similar comments
(on:
Modern submarine torpedo attacks are not like in the movies
)
Well, they don't need to be rechargable...
reply
SaulJLH | karma 37 | avg karma 0.49
|
2022-06-04 09:01:27
|
next
[–]
similar comments
(on:
Polar night energy – sand battery
)
It doesn't mention why this, and not actual batteries.
reply
ncmncm | karma 13951 | avg karma 1.02
|
2022-06-09 17:23:50
|
next
[–]
similar comments
(on:
Why are nuclear power construction costs so high? Part I
)
Mentioning batteries can only distract from sensible discussion, because only the tiniest fraction of utility-scale storage will ever be batteries.
reply
jonahss | karma 1131 | avg karma 5.49
|
2022-11-29 23:26:41
|
next
[–]
similar comments
(on:
Show HN: Trading cards made with e-ink displays
)
Ah yeah, the current cards do not have batteries.
reply
Mrdarknezz | karma 93 | avg karma 1.15
|
2020-08-31 13:54:50+00:00
|
next
[–]
similar comments
(on:
The danger from climate change no longer outweighs risks of nuclear accidents
)
Batteries are not feasible economically or capacity wise.
reply
theptip | karma 9431 | avg karma 3.56
|
2022-10-27 16:15:34
|
next
[–]
similar comments
(on:
Why is hydroelectricity unfashionable?
)
You don't use batteries to cover that worst-case scenario.
reply
tyingq | karma 59102 | avg karma 3.47
|
2018-03-30 00:34:19+00:00
|
next
[–]
similar comments
(on:
Swift 4.1 Released
)
Ahh, yes. That makes sense. No batteries included.
reply
twic | karma 21889 | avg karma 3.14
|
2016-08-31 20:05:20
|
next
[–]
similar comments
(on:
Atom 1.10 and 1.11 beta
)
Well they don't eat batteries, it seems. I know, doesn't make a lot of sense to me either.
reply
rio517 | karma 588 | avg karma 6.0
|
2021-01-07 23:40:05+00:00
|
next
[–]
similar comments
(on:
A Porsche Taycan Just Beat Tesla for the Fastest EV Cannonball Run Record
)
Annalists have been saying this for years. I'm skeptical. Along many other reasons, there aren't enough batteries to go around.
reply
next
Legal
|
privacy
reply