Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

> plutonic friends

Did you mean "Platonic friends"?

Although it sounds kinda nice to have Plutonic friends as well, since they'd have yachts and what not.



sort by: page size:

Yes i did mean friends:)

> Friends are peers that have similar life experiences and values (and humor)

This is an pretty narrow definition of friendship.


What you mean "friends"?

Did you mean “friends”, or am I not getting the pun?

    > I’ve done plenty of business with friends. In fact, the 
    > majority of my business has been with friends or 
    > acquaintances. Some of those friends even stopped using 
    > me when I raised rates over the years and they’re still 
    > my friends. I’m having drinks with one of them tonight, 
    > in fact.
I'm happy that doing business with your friends worked out in this case, but in general I'd tend to stay away from it. Nothing can ruin a great friendship like money.

I didn't mean "friend" literally. I was using an oft-repeated phrase.

> But if I know someone, even if I don't like them, they're a friend.

That's not the definition of the word "friend" as it is conventionally used. Sounds like the word "acquaintance" would be more appropriate to me.


>a friend

uh huh! :)


> FWIW, a friend of mine (and not "a friend of mine")

What? Do you mean a coworker or something as compared to a friend?


> This is more a guide for fairweather friends.

"Fairweather friends" are not friends. They're "close acquaintances" at best.


> “The fact that they are my friend means there’s something cool and interesting about this person,”

Yeah maybe they like the same board games or the same beer as you and that's their cool and interesting thing that makes them your friend. Doesn't mean their business idea is worth any penny.


The author is aware of this and makes this point multiple times in the article. "Friends" in "Friends of Friends" is capitalized deliberately.

My reading of the article didn't imply that it was soley on the basis of friendship, but just that one of his members was a close friend.

EDIT: s/one/some/; s/a close friend/close friends/


That actually made me laugh out loud, but I assume they meant their colleagues who are also their friends. Something like the logician's definition of 'and', I suppose.

But what about friends?

"no, that's different. [name] is my friend!"

How did you conclude he’s talking about friends? In the whole article word "friend" doesn’t appear even once. Also, a person can hardly have hundreds of friends. Three, sure. Seven, very probably. Twelve, maybe. But hundreds? Impossible.

>Nope.

Do you believe that you can not have a friendship when there are economic factors at play? That is an understandable belief, though I disagree, and if you believe that, the rest of what you said makes sense; in your mind I would be throwing away a friendship when I hired a friend. Of course, that's not what I believe, but that would explain our disagreement.


I think you're taking it out of context. It's about work friends, not friends in general.
next

Legal | privacy