Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

There are differences:

Bitcoins can be divided. Ana can take her pile of coins and mark them as "This half can be moved by Berta in the future and the other half can be moved by Charles in the future". Now what was one pile is now two piles.

Bitcoins can be combined. To combine two piles of coins into one, one has to be the owner of both piles.



sort by: page size:

The main difference is that this is literally all Bitcoin is intended for - “just another way that money exchanges hands.”

A bitcoin can be divided into many pieces.

The difference is that those things are actually useful.

Also, bitcoin is fiat.


I think the name "Bitcoin" is confusing, because the system doesn't really have coins — it has addresses and transactions. Money just flows from the output(s) of one transaction to the input(s) of another. BTC can be arbitrarily divided by creating a transaction with multiple outputs; one is the payee and one is change going back to the payer. (I apologize that that probably makes no sense; I think you really have to read Satoshi's paper to understand it.)

No real difference, I was just driving the point of BitCoin's usefullness as a way of making general everyday transactions.

I guess the difference is you don't earn interest by holding other peoples bitcoins, you do by holding their cash. Apparently there is an android app coming.

pardon my ignorance. I though Bitcoin was (is) a cryptocurrency. Can you explain the difference please?

No, it's not the same. Bitcoin is like gold, which you also can't use to pay for groceries. A better example is if you were to physically mail bars of gold vs digitally sending Bitcoin.

Bitcoin is one of a number of ways.

Yes. Bitcoin division is dramatically simpler and more precise than that of any physical material.

Each "bill" in bitcoin includes a full transaction history, which gets shared with every other bitcoin user. It's quite different knowing that a dollar bill got from A to B, vs a bitcoin which tells you exactly how it travelled from A to B.

How was this different from Bitcoin ?

Bitcoins are like bearer bonds. Unlike houses.

Bitcoin, just like traditional money, can exist as a non-blockchain ledger entry in bank's computer system. This is how most exchanges and custodial wallets work.

The difference is, you can also self-custody your Bitcoin. Obviously what's in your custody is just a private key; but for all intents and purposes that is self-custody. You are the sole person in control of those coins.

So Bitcoin gives you the choice of how you want to store it. Traditional money does not give you that choice. At a certain point there are physical and practical limits to how much cash you can self-custody (not to mention transport or transfer from one place or person to another).


The key difference is that you can _learn_ what Bitcoin is. And you can do it on your own, without prestigious colleges and country clubs.

Consider the difference between a Bitcoin and dollars in your bank account. You can own Bitcoin but your bank account just shows how much dollars your bank owes you, you don't own any of the dollars yourself.

I guess the difference is cars are useful.

What can I do with a bitcoin except hope to sell it for more USD later?


Do you really not see the difference between Bitcoin and, say, Paypal?

Bitcoin closely resembles a strictly finite physical resource. Paypal does no such thing. Bitcoin is money. Paypal is a system for sending money.


Bitcoins
next

Legal | privacy