Hacker Read

michaelwww · 2022-09-14 14:57:33

16 bit is not enough?

KingOfCoders | karma 8559 | avg karma 2.83 · | 2023-04-06 00:21:05

16 bit should be enough for everybody.

chippy | karma 10184 | avg karma 4.63 · | 2014-05-26 20:01:24+00:00

16-bit

pantalaimon | karma 13220 | avg karma 6.05 · | 2021-10-11 03:47:48

that's how much you can address with 16 bit

zasdffaa | karma 970 | avg karma 1.14 · | 2022-12-01 10:51:10

Do you (or anyone) have some idea why anyone could possibly have thought 16 bits would be enough? Many decisions are bad in hindsight but surely no hindsight was needed for that.

tambourine_man | karma 37043 | avg karma 6.16 · | 2024-01-12 04:41:51

> 65535

Why limit yourself to 16bit?

reply

AndyKelley | karma 9290 | avg karma 6.93 · | 2016-01-08 12:42:17

If 16 bits is enough, then you should be using int16_t. If 16 bits is not enough, then you should not be using int.

devit | karma 4074 | avg karma 2.94 · | 2023-11-08 09:27:43

16-bit bytes?

thrownaway2424 | karma 5065 | avg karma 2.66 · | 2014-10-14 18:13:21

16-bit? Did they mean 4-bit?

nokcha | karma 1350 | avg karma 5.25 · | 2020-04-13 11:41:50

It's 16 bytes, not 16 bits.

stjohnswarts | karma 5817 | avg karma 0.86 · | 2021-12-29 01:12:31

but 16 bits >> 8 bits? Can the AI community get by with 8 bits?

SomeoneFromCA | karma 655 | avg karma 0.7 · | 2020-06-16 17:24:42+00:00

You might be right, however 16-bit sounds really harsh to my ears, and 24-bits is the only widely used standard, better than 16-bit.

jandrese | karma 30121 | avg karma 3.36 · | 2019-10-03 23:13:13

IIRC the real rationale is back in the early days people bet that 16 bits would be enough for a fixed length encoding, but the bet didn't pay off and now they're stuck with the worst of both worlds.

basdp | karma 31 | avg karma 0.65 · | 2018-08-31 17:11:44+00:00

But most of these are 16-bit...

nikbackm | karma 6555 | avg karma 10.21 · | 2013-11-05 08:40:15

You mean they should have stayed at 16 bits?

What would happen to all the characters that don't fit in that case, better luck in other standards?

reply

Narishma | karma 3253 | avg karma 1.67 · | 2014-12-28 18:19:28

Is there a reason it wouldn't be 16 bits like in C?

t0bia_s | karma 1796 | avg karma 1.12 · | 2022-07-10 17:11:33

Even 16bit.

anthk | karma 3504 | avg karma 0.6 · | 2022-04-04 08:28:44

8, you mean. 16 bit allows a big pallete, near true color, but bad gradients.

vardump | karma 7011 | avg karma 2.24 · | 2016-01-09 07:19:06+00:00

> If 16 bits is enough, use an explicitly 16-bit integer.

This will often generate more code. So don't do this except when it saves a modest amount of memory.

reply

kevin_thibedeau | karma 19088 | avg karma 2.16 · | 2014-12-03 00:55:34+00:00

Just as many as all of the 8-bit systems in use today. There is no need, in the vast majority of cases, for wide data busses in embedded applications. 16-bit is going to die out, though, like the 4-bit and bitslice processors.