Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

A lot of positions even within FAANGs have nothing to do with Surveillance.


sort by: page size:

neither is electronic surveillance

There isn't a single point for "surveillance state".

Notifications/alerts have zero bearing on surveillance capabilities.

There is no evidence that the messages are being collected dragnet-style. FAA702 is targeted.

And that they have no monitoring to detect breaches.

And this is precisely why a thing that is not monitored is not actually a thing.

They also don't work with the NSA.

The policy could be shorter: we don't monitor you.

It's not true. Monitoring is not required.

This is a false dichotomy, we don't need to be tracked by either.

Not in classified networks.

There hasn't been a check after the illegal surveillance was made public though, so it doesn't exist in reality and it is unlikely to change.

Both have nothing to do with SIP surveilled through black boxes and intelligence agents being cleared to destroy informatic systems.

None of those technical credentials involve airport security.

Which has nothing to do with the "presence and communications" data you actually commented about.

None of it was classified.

This information won't be useful to track any individual.

Police data is not classified.
next

Legal | privacy